Showing posts with label feminism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label feminism. Show all posts

Sunday, March 24, 2019

The end of feminism (Part 4)...College exam scams, Lori Loughlin, the fallacious meritocracy of america's universities, white affirmative action, and the (continuing) ethnic escapades of Rachel Dolezal...


To the (consistent) readers of this blog: Whenever I write a post in this series, I feel obligated to preface the subject matter with the reason why white fascist feminism, has nothing to do with female empowerment—especially in regards to the (indigenous) Black woman. And when I use the term “indigenous” that’s not hyperbole. Meaning, if you’re a Black woman reading this from anywhere in the world, understand, you (and we) were on this earth before anyone else. Thus, we should understand why we have the most genetic power(s) to breed every other ethnic group out of existence if we so choose—and this is especially true of white folks.

So, I feel it’s imperative that I reiterate what feminism is, and what it ain’t—moreover, let me tell the tale of how this fascist feat of social engineering got started…

Years ago, I watched a PBS program, where a man who looked like the spitting image of George Soros, the billionaire Hedge Fund manager, waxed philosophic about an upper-scale soiree he attended, where he got into a conversation with a Rockefeller. He said this man asked him what he thought about “Women’s Lib” (for those of you under 30, this was the “Women’s Liberation movement” that preceded modern day feminism), to which the George Soros looking fellow said, “Well, I think it’s positive, you know, equal pay for equal work”. The Rockefeller replied, “We funded Women’s Lib—and the reason we did was, we couldn’t tax half the population if they were staying at home and being housewives—we had to get women into the work force to get at that revenue…” A sec’ later, the Rockefeller continued, “…and with both parents out of the household, we essentially knew that the TV would be the authoritative figure raising (america’s) children—thus, consecutive generations would be easier to program and control.”

And I’ll confess, after hearing that, my mind was forever changed. Not only cause the Rockefeller’s soliloquy made absolute sense to me, but it introduced me to a level of insidious ingenuity and esoteric info. that put me on a path of seeking out factoids that were parallel, or at least congruent with these trains of thought.

So, it’s with this sentiment in mind that I wanna’ explore and expound on the ways that 2 particular white women, Lori Loughlin and Rachel Dolezal, fit into the social engineering campaigns of white fascist feminism, in regards to their place in it, and how it benefits them (whether they realize it or not).

With that said, let’s delve into the nucleus of what makes these college exam scams a matter of course when it comes to the tenets of white fascism and white fascist feminism.

—MontUHURU Mimia

Lori Anne Loughlin (right), the american-born actress, model and producer, was born on July 28th, 1964 to parents Lorelee and Joseph Roy Loughlin, in Queens, New York City. And while in elementary school, Lori’s parents noticed her interests in acting had blossomed into a full-blown passion—thus, Lori began to pursue this career with her parents help, when she became a print model at the tender age of 11.

At 15, Lori was cast in the soap opera, “The Edge of Night”, playing the part of Jodi Travis, an aspiring dancer. That gig lasted from 1980 to 1983, before Lori began to pick up bit parts in an assortment of feature films and TV guest spots. Then, in 1988, Lori stumbled upon what would become her career-defining role, as Rebecca Donaldson, on the ABC sit-com, “Full House”. Initially set for six episodes, Lori would remain a staple of the show throughout the rest of the series until 1995. Months after the show ended, Lori starred alongside TV actor, Tony Danza, in another ABC sit-com, Hudson Street—unfortunately, the show was met with poor reviews and ratings, and was cancelled in a year.

In the following years, Lori would go on to guest and co-star in several TV shows, like: Suddenly Susan, Spin City, Seinfeld, The Drew Carey Show, etc. From 2004 to 2005, she co-created, produced, and starred in the “WB” drama series, “Summerland”—and she’d continue to appear in feature films like, “Moondance Alexander” (2007), and the made-for-TV-movie, “Meet My Mom”, which premiered on the Hallmark Channel on Mother’s Day in 2010.

Rachel Anne Dolezal (left), a.k.a. Nkechi Amare Diallo (please!), was born on November 12th, 1977 to parents Ruthanne and Lawrence “Larry” Dolezal, in Lincoln County, Montana. Now, Rachel was homeschooled via the “Christian Liberty Academy” or “CLASS” program, where she achieved a 4.0 GPA, and not only was she a co-valedictorian at her high school graduation, but she won a $2,000 collegiate scholarship awarded by “Tandy Leather” for her entry in their 1996 Leather Art contest. Thereafter, Rachel attended Belhaven University in Jackson, Mississippi, where she received a bachelor’s degree in 2000, and after that, she applied and was accepted to, Howard University (yes, the “historically” Black college) for her graduate studies. There, she received her Masters of Fine Arts degree.

Now, behind Rachel’s “Civil Rights” themed artwork, which included sculptures and paintings that held to narratives of Black people’s struggles against america’s white fascism, she was elected as head of the Spokane, Washington chapter of the NAACP. Her announced resignation from the position came on June 15, 2015 behind friends, family members and numerous media reports exposing her as being “non-Black”.  

Dolezal also applied for and was given the position of Spokane, Washington’s Chair of the Office of Police Ombudsman Commission in May of 2014. Now, on Rachel’s application, she claimed to have come from a wide variety of ethnic backgrounds, including “African-american”—and at the beginning of 2015, City Council President Ben Stuckart opened an investigation into the truthfulness of her ethnicity. Shortly thereafter, on June 17th, 2015, it was found that Rachel not only lied about her ethnic makeup, but she’d violated governmental rules and “abused” her authority in this position, which prompted both the mayor and the Spokane City Council to fire Rachel from being the chair of the Police Ombudsman Commission.

Now, let’s stop here.

Seemingly, Lori and Rachel—or Nkechi (again, please!), have nothing in common—other than their ethnic backgrounds. But these white women are actually so similar, they could be carbon copies of each other.

Now, the readers of this post may be thinkin’—bruh, I don’t see the connection—you’re gonna’ have to prove this one to me.

Bet.

Let me show you not only one example of why these two are so stereotypically white—but 3 examples that’ll bring this point home…

#1. Both Lori and Rachel, not only relish their white (fascist) privileges, but they’re staunch practitioners of it.

Now, Lori was recently arrested for paying some $500,000 in bribes to have her 2 daughters admitted into the University of Southern California’s “crew team”. Mind you, not only have neither of Lori’s daughters ever competed in “crew teams”, but 50 other (white) people are facing federal charges for paying out similar bribes. This kinda reminds me of when you’d hear about the unjust practice of Black students, Black male student athletes especially, paying to have people do their homework (and take exams) for them so they’d get into college—welp, seems like whitey’s the one whos really been doin’ this all along—difference is, if Tyrone was given an athletic scholarship, he’d have to prove his prowess on the field or court (and mind you, when we do this, its called affirmative action). Also, in the case of Lori’s daughters, the only evidence they have of participating in any kind of “crew team” sports, was a picture of them (by themselves) sitting on a rowing machine.

Now, I can already hear folks who’re reading this thinkin’, well that may apply to Lori, but Rachel was tryna’ be Black, bruh—so how does your argument apply to her?

Here’s how…

While Rachel was at Howard U., she passed herself off as a Black woman. But after she was accepted, she turned back around to “re-claim” her “whiteness” (calling herself Rachel “Moore”), and made it a point to say she’d been denied access to certain scholarship funds, an assistant teacher’s position, and other opportunities at Howard cause—wait for it—she was white. So, like every other white feminist, she wants the ability to have her cake and eat it too—meaning, she wants to enjoy her white privileges, while trying to pass herself off as an “oppressed minority”. Now, you may be sayin’, yeah bruh, I get that, but that still don’t make her a staunch advocate or practitioner of white fascism.  

Welp, let me break this point down even further…

See, the reason Rachel endeavored to go to Howard U. and apply for a position with the NAACP, is because she’d been told her whole life, by her white parents, that Black people were getting all these unfair advantages, just ‘cause they were Black. Namely, her parents raised her to believe that Black people would (automatically) get more financial aid than white people, and that our lazy, shiftless butts were collecting more welfare than anyone else. That’s why she’s done whatever she could to pass herself off as a sista—it has nothing to do with loving us or our culture. Mind you, the majority of people on welfare in this country are white, and it’s been that way for decades—and I’ll leave a link to a website that proves this.

And in even more laymen’s terms: white fascism’s stereotypes of Black people turned Rachel into a straight-up ethnic HUSTLA’ y’all!

#2. Both Lori and Rachel are such advocates of white fascism and white fascist feminism, that they’re willing to suffer the consequences of their allegiances to it.

Meaning, Lori was so hell-bent on benefitting from her white fascist privileges that she was willing to do something illegal and risk going to jail for her beliefs. And wit’ Rachel, her devotions are even more extreme—cause recently she was brought up on charges of welfare fraud. It seems that good ol’ “Nkechi” didn’t report the $83,924 she deposited in her bank account, when she said she’d made less than $500 a year to apply for welfare. Mind you, Rachel collected $8,747 in food stamps and $100 for child care expenses from 2015 ‘til 2017.

#3. white fascism let Lori and Rachel off tha’ hook—just like they knew it would.

Now, Lori’s already been released from jail and her bail was set at $1 million dollars. Mind you, not only is Lori outta’ jail, but she’s free to continue working. And that even includes traveling to British Columbia for roles. The only caveat of that is, she’ll have to surrender her passport in December. Rachel was also set free shortly after she was booked—mind you, she was charged with first degree theft by welfare fraud and second-degree perjury. She pleaded not guilty to both these charges. Now, do you think any sista who’d committed these crimes would have walked out of jail like Nkechi, I mean, Rachel did?

So, I’ve said all that to say this: the people who love white male patriarchies more than white men, ARE WHITE WOMEN!

BLACK FEMINIST/WOMANYISTS, PLEASE TAKE NOTICE!!

I understand that collegiate Black women may befriend white girls who seem very sincere to their feminists ideologies, but once they graduate, they’ll be looking for a white guy to insert them into the comfy confines of white privilege.

AND DON’T TAKE MY WORD FOR IT—JUST ASK THE OVERWHELMING MAJORITY OF PEOPLE WHO VOTED FOR DONALD TRUMP—AND ITS NO COINCIDENCE, THAT THEY JUST HAPPEN TO BE WHITE WOMEN!

And like Sam L. Jackson said in Spike Lee’s classic movie, “Do the Right Thing”: “That’s the double truth, Ruth.”

Later…

—MontUHURU Mimia

P.S.

Here’s a vid clip showing how hard Rachels working to convince herself and everyone else that she’s a sista—which goes to prove that if you repeat a lie long enough, it’ll become a truth—at least to you. *Note: check out what happens when a journalist asks Rachel to confirm if her parents are Black.


P.P.S.

If you wanna’ check out the website that shows how the majority of the people on welfare in america are white, you can do that HERE.

 P.P.S.

And for y’all whore wonderinghere’s where I got this saying from…

Sunday, December 2, 2018

The end of feminism (Part 3.5)...Blythe Masters, Credit default swaps, the bitter-sweetness of "Bitcoins", Jay-Z's Diasporic manifesto, and the rise of "disaster" capitalism...


“I do believe CDS’s (Credit Default Swaps) have been miscast, much as poor workmen tend to blame their tools.”

—Blythe Masters 

“Financial freedom’s our only hope…”

—Jay-Z, from the song, “The Story of O.J.”

To the readers of this blog: One of the reasons I started the “End of feminism” series, is to spotlight the fact that (one) of white fascism’s deadliest weapons—is the white woman. And that means what? It means that because white women have been given the title of the world’s prettiest and most exquisitely feminine female (according to european standards anyway), more often than not, the Black Diaspora will let their collective guards down, when it comes to her stealthier and more finessed form(s) of fascism.

For example, a Black man who’s slated to make a lot of money, will often be targeted by white fascist freemasons, to not only join their ranks, but to be paired with some icy-blue eyed, hawk-nosed, and flat-assed white female, so his money stays in their clutches. And for Black women, it could be joining up with some feminist cadre whose real goal, is to give a Black female (or at least to make her feel) like she’ll have more access to white men by joining them, in hopes that she’ll marry one some day. And white women’ll do this, while telling Black women that they’re “sisters in the same struggle”.

Always remember family, the ultimate goal of white fascism, is to MAKE SURE THAT BLACK MEN AND WOMEN DO NOT GIVE BIRTH TO ANOTHER BLACK CHILD, WITH THE SAME GENETIC POWER TO WIPE THEM OUT, THAT WE HAVE! Also remember, because of this, ONE OF US ANYWHERE, IS A THREAT TO THEM EVERYWHERE!

So, Blythe Masters’ story is yet another example of a white woman working to further the causes of the pale-skinned fascist agenda, all while she and her kind, try to pass themselves off as an “oppressed minority”. 

Now, Blythe Masters’ endgame not only fits in with the 3 tenets of the “Hegelian Dialect” (Problem, Reaction, Solution), but this dastardly template reminds me so much of a “3-act” play, that I thought it warranted my presentation of her tragic trajectory, in 3-acts. Now, for those who aren’t familiar with the 3-act play (or movie) format, it basically consists of the first act, which is the set-up for the main incident that kicks the whole story off, the second act, which describes the confrontation, or the “rising action” that fuels the story’s momentum, and the third act which is the story’s “resolution”, which basically details how the whole darn thing will end. Mind you, I’m doing this ‘cause Blythe, at least in my opinion, is the poster-girl for not only what’s wrong with the financial industry, but the covert agenda that’s fueling its convoluted culture.

Now, (supposedly) outside the confines of corporate boardrooms, we have the rapper Jay-Z—who’s not only a white fascist freemason, but says in his song, “The Story of O.J.”, that “financial freedom’s our only hope…” And understand, while Jay may not have the ear of middle-aged Black folks like myself, he’s definitely influencing our children—and ultimately, that’s why he makes so much money, ‘cause he’s got the power to make people do the things he says.

And with that said, I’ll thank you in advance for your kind indulgences, while I break down the real goal of whitey’s financially engineered fascist maneuverings, with an emphasis on the insidious agenda(s) of globally marketed “exotic” monetary instruments. And as always, I invite you to let me know what ya’ think about my take on this sordid topic.

—MontUHURU Mimia

Act 1: Blythe’s Beginnings

Blythe Sally Jess Levett, better known as Blythe Masters (right), was born in Oxford, England, on March 22nd, 1969, and attended the “King’s School” in Canterbury, England. Now, this is the “boarding” school, which provided her with much of her grade, middle and high-schooling needs, before she attended “Trinity College”, where in 1991, she graduated with a B.A. in Economics.

Shortly after graduation, Blythe joined the J.P. Morgan banking company, where she worked her way up to a managing director at 28. Mind you, she was the youngest director to hold that position in the firm’s history. Also, for the record, Blythe took the last name, “Masters” after she married her ex, Daniel, who also works in finance. Now, it was before winning the title of managing director, that Blythe not only became a white fascist freemason, but was tasked by her masonic handlers to help them solve an age-old problem. And that was, how to (legally) loop-hole around the pesky regulations mandating that banks have a required amount of money on hand, so they could more safely cover monetary or credit losses in the future. Basically, banks were looking for a better way to manage credit risks, so they’d be more profitable.

So, in June of 1994, a group of financiers in J.P. Morgan’s global derivatives department, went to a luxurious resort hotel in Boca Raton, Florida, for a weekend excursion, where they’d come up with an answer to their industry’s dilemma.

Mind you, during this “convention”, this group of “twenty-something” financial engineers got drunk, jumped into the hotel’s pool(s) fully clothed, and basically had a party, while mulling over ways to navigate around credit risk. Now, keep in mind, when I say these were a group of “twenty-somethings”, I’m talking about young people in their early 20’s. So, these were basically a group of kids tasked with solving an industry-wide problem—and the leader of this jejune coterie, was none other than Blythe Masters.

48 hours later, this confederacy of well-educated dunces, came up with the idea of purchasing “insurance” policies, that would remove risks intrinsic to issuing loans—and in more layman’s terms, they’d created a buffer between them and defaulted credit—and these “exotic” financial instruments would be called, “Credit Default Swaps”.

Now, you might be thinking, okay, theoretically, that’s nice to know bruh, but how does this work in real life? Welp, let’s take the case of the Exxon-Valdez oil spill that happened in 1998, as an example.

Now before that year, J.P. Morgan had extended a $4.8 billion-dollar credit loan to Exxon. After the spill, Exxon faced a $5 billion-dollar lawsuit, after dumping literally millions of gallons of oil in Alaska’s Prince William Sound. Now, a group of J.P. Morgan bankers (again led by Blythe) purchased insurance against Exxon’s credit line, with the help of the “european Bank of Reconstruction and Development” who issued the insuring bond to them. And this not only shielded the bank from Exxon’s blunder financially, but it also allowed J.P. Morgan to cut the cost of capital it was required to hold against Exxon’s default. And this essentially reduced J.P. Morgan’s own risk—making the bank more profitable. Mind you, these Credit Default Swaps (CDS’s) were considered so revolutionary, that not only did the whole of the banking industry adopt them, but behind their protections, J.P. Morgan began bundling these “risky” loans together and sold them in packages they called “BISTRO”, and this stood for “Broad Index Secured Trust Offering(s)”. On top of that, these new “bad loans” were bought by other financial institutions, to be sold off to yet another bank. So, the finance industry now had free (and legal) reign to begin cannibalizing itself.

Act 2: Monetary Meltdown(s)

Now, when the finance industry’s home loan brokers saw what CDS’s would allow them to do, they dove in head first. And what this meant was, banks (or organizations like them) basically didn’t have to have any repositories of cash or credit to cover loans, so they could offer the homebuyer any kind of outrageous sum of money to buy a home, if they had a CDS in play—and all that banker or broker would have to worry about, was collecting their fee. Thus, some real estate brokering agencies would take out several loans on the same house—'cause it didn’t matter whether the homebuyer could afford them or not, as long as brokers got paid, they were good.

Mind you, hundreds of banks were doing this, to the point where it became so common, that these practices were given a name, “predatory lending”. And while all this went on, these bad home loans were bundled up, and sold on stock markets to any corporation(s) wanting them—then the company that purchased them, would sell them to another bank. Mind you, this was creating what finance industries call a “bubble”, which had been growing since the turn of the new millennium—and it would all come to screeching halt in 2008.

Fast forward to 2008, when a “financial crisis” hits america.

Now, most people who lived to see this, remember that people on “Main Street” lost their jobs, homes, families, etc. due to the abuses of the financial industry—while “Wall Street”, which represented america’s biggest banks, got bailed out by bureaucrats, via “TARP” Funding. Mind you, “TARP” stood for “Troubled Asset Relief Program” and it effectively excused banks for their thievery by “gifting” them with $700 BILLION dollars, to make their troubles magically go away. And adding insult to injury, financial executives in charge of these funds, took hundreds of thousands of dollars of this money, and literally threw parties with it. So much so, that separate legislation had to be written to abate these abuses.

Now, let’s stop here a sec’…

Cause this is the “official” story of what happened—but what actually happened was this: Henry Paulson ( Bush Jr.’s Treasury Secretary back in 2008) was tasked with destabilizing america’s finance industry, so the government could take it over. Mind you, Blythe was just doing her part in created the insidious financial instrument that would get the ball rolling, so the markets could go bust—which they did.

And this fits the 3-staged template of the “Hegelian Dialect” to the letter—so, let’s go through those steps right quick…

Step 1: Problem: whitey wants control of american banks

Mr. white folks saw the scandalous amounts of money being made in the finance industry and felt like they weren’t getting enough of that action, so they needed to find a way to shut the whole system down and start anew—with them running the show.

Step 2: Reaction: Creating the instrument of destruction

Ordo Ab Chao, or “Order out of chaos” is not only a motto of freemasonry, it’s the actual means by which they gain control of the world. So, they tasked ol’ girl Blythe to come up with an “exotic” means of destroying the financial markets, and they infected the whole of the industry with this “disease”. And when the disease effectively killed the organization (or organism), fascists enacted the third step…

Step 3: Solution: The “Jack” move

Henry Paulson, with the sanction of his freemasonic handlers, meets with the head of america’s top banks, and tells them about the “bail-out” monies that’ll be given to them. Now, some bank CEO’s refused the money (cause they understood they’d be under governmental rule), to which Henry said (and this is documented), anyone of you who refuse this money will see your bank(s) destroyed. So, this was a good ol’ fashioned “stick up”, without the gun.

Act 3: Blythe, the “blockchain”, “BitCoin”, and the real-real “endgame”

Now, when the dust settled in the finance industry, I remember Blythe’s CDS’s being called a “weapon of mass destruction” by finance guru, Warren Buffet. And with that kinda’ bad press, you’d think for sure that no one (in finance at least) would want anything to do with Blythe, right?

Wrong.

From 2001 to 2004, Blythe became J.P. Morgan’s “head of Global Portfolio and Credit Policy and Strategy”—from 2004 to 2007, she became the Chief Financial Officer of J.P. Morgan’s Investment bank—and surprise of all surprises, J.P. Morgan was caught manipulating energy markets in California and Michigan under Blythe’s tutelages. And behind this fiasco, they had to pay $410 million dollars in damages. Blythe left J.P. Morgan shortly afterwards.

Now, in 2015, Blythe became the Chief Executive of a company called, “Digital Asset Holdings”. And this is a consortium that distributes “ledger technology” to reduce cost, risk, and capital requirements in wholesale financial services. Mind you, this ledger technology goes by a more common name, and that is the “blockchain”. Moreover, this technology was created to support the “BitCoin” cryptocurrency. And again, surprise of surprises, BitCoin stocks are in a precipitous fall—and in more layman’s terms, the stock’s tanking y’all.

Additionally, I’d be remiss, if I didn’t say this: the real-real endgame of any kind of american (or even global) currency, whether it be digital or physical, is a TOTAL DEVALUATION of it. Meaning, whitey has to make every currency totally worthless.

Why you ask?

Cause in order for whitey to get any working-class person to be a willing slave, he’s got to make them think they have no money. This way, people will be complicit with any plans white fascism’s got for ‘em. Mind you, they can’t do that all at once, cause too many people would revolt, and the working class outnumber elites by like 100 to 1.

Remember, money was only given to the masses to block our access to resources—PERIOD.

So, in conclusion, let me just say, that white men and their women, should be recognized for what and who they really are—arbiters of death.

Now, am I telling you that you shouldn’t make money?

ABSOLUTELY NOT!

I’ve said all this to say, that money is not sustainable, and whitey will make sure of that—so, the ONLY virtue that will ultimately save us is UNITY!!

And IT’S THE ONE RESOURCE THAT’S ABSOLUTELY FREE!

With it, we can get EVERYTHING!

Without it, we can’t get ANYTHING!

SO THAT BLACK MAN AND WOMAN, IS WHAT WE SHOULD STRIVE FOR FROM THIS DAY FORWARD!

And like Samuel L. Jackson said in Spike Lee’s movie, “Do the Right Thing”: “That’s the double truth, Ruth”.

Later…

—MontUHURU Mimia

P.S.

Family, I had to include this vid, which is a CNBC interview with Blythe in 2009, a year after america's financial crisis. Now, rarely do I see much in the way of emotional displays, when it comes to finance broadcasting, but check out how CNBCs description of Blythes corporate title says that shes the woman behind financial weapons of mass destruction. That always makes me laugh. Mind you at this time Blythe was working for SIFMA  (Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association), meaning J.P. Morgan had to temporarily give her more of a “covert” banking position, cause she was too much of a lightning rod, at that point. And I apologize in advance about this vids lack of clarity, but it's content (I believe) more than makes up for it. 

    

Saturday, June 9, 2018

The end of feminism (Part 2)...Why is Donald Trump the world's greatest feminist?


To the readers of this Blog: I’ve sincerely missed posting on this platform, as I always do when I’m away. And as always, I’ll proffer no excuses for my lack of discipline when it comes to editorializing on this space. Once again, life “thangs” kept me from keeping up with my responsibilities here. But what I will affirm, again, is how I’m always thinking of this Blog in some form or fashion. So even when I’m not posting regularly, know that I’m constantly mulling over ideas, topics, and different approaches to what I’ll write next.

And what I’ll also say is, I still haven’t entirely gotten all the subject matters I’d covered for “The Cult of Black and white Cinematic Symbolism” series out. So after this, I’ll probably return to that. But with Don Trump as of late, being reluctant to meet with Korea’s Kim Jong Un, his putting himself in legal jeopardy by lying about his ties to Russian mob boss, I mean, Prime Minister, Vladmir Putin, Don’s claims that he has the power to “pardon himself”, if he’s found to have garnered the presidency by ill-gotten means, and his still talking about Obama tapping his offices phones, I wanna’ take time to remember how this “Trumpian” tragedy got started—with white women, voting him into office.

And, like before, since I’ve been away from this space, the subject matter of my forthcoming posts may sound a bit dated, but I assure you, they’ll always be pertinent to the goal of exposing the white fascist agenda. And Ill also remind everyone, that Im always writing with the reader in mind, so even if this post is a bit long-winded, it should prove to be a comfortably fluid read.

And lastly, to the people who cared enough to visit this space while I was away, I say, thank you, thank you and thank you.

—MontUHURU Mimia

One evening while watching a PBS (Public Broadcasting Station) in my city, a fellow who looked a lot like George Soros, and if you don’t know who that is, google him, talked about a discourse he’d had with a member of the Rockefeller family. He said, at a party he attended, one of the Rockefellers asked him what he’d thought about the 1970’s “Women’s Lib(eration)” movement (which in the 80’s and 90’s would become the “Feminist movement”). The George Soros-looking fellow replied, that it seemed positive, and how their adopted slogan: “equal work for equal pay” was progressive. To that the Rockefeller stated, “We funded Women’s Lib—and the reason we did was, we couldn’t tax half the population, if women were staying at home and being housewives.”

Now, the Rockefeller’s statement prompted three thoughts in my head instantly, and those were:

#1. I was awestruck at the wicked ingenuity displayed by the elites behind the “trick of Feminism”, and how they got generations of women to buy into it.

#2. I was repulsed by this same wickedness, a second later.

#3. I knew that with this bit of info., I’d never see the world the same again, and I’d be on a life-long search for other kinds of esoteric info. like this.

Now, you might be thinkin’, bruh, just ‘cause you heard a theory on TV, don’t make it true. And you’re right, it doesn’t—but this “theory” has been proven several times over, by the most unlikely of sources—and that source is america’s white women themselves.

But to make my point, let’s start here: The 2016 presidential campaign of one Hillary Rodham Clinton, was first announced on a “YouTube” video, on April 12th, 2015. She’d served for the first term of the Obama administration as the “Secretary of State” from 2009 to 2013, and this campaign marked her second bite at the presidential apple after Obama bested her in 2008. Mind you, the Associated Press called Hillary the “presumptive nominee” for the Democratic presidential run, after she reached the required number of voting delegates on June 6th, 2016. She even picked a “Vice Presidential running mate”, and that was Virginia Senator, Tim Kaine. And the two were officially nominated, at the 2016 Democratic National Convention.

Yep, good ole Hilly, seemed a shoe-in for the next president of these united snakes, I mean, states. To top that off, she seemed like the logical successor while the Democrats ran the white house. And it felt like the feminist manifesto would finally reach its apex with Hilly in the nation’s top spot. Why, before Obama, I even remember hearing a white woman openly boast that there’d be a woman president, before there’d ever be a Black one.

But then, the darndest thing happened—Trump won (and I use this term lightly) the presidential election.

And I think everyone, myself included, kinda’ scratched their head for a moment thinking, well, the ratio of american women to men, is like 4 to 1—so what gives? Then, news pollsters found out that white women, more than any other kind of woman in america, voted in droves for good ole Don Trump.

Then my Black Nationalist sensibilities kicked in, and I nodded my head thinking, that figures.

And the stats said this: 52 % of white women voted for Trump (and I think that’s a low estimate). So that means 6 out of 10 white women, voted for the bellicose, hyper-chauvinistic, and sexist Don.

Now, I remember how the media tried to spin this fact saying, the majority of white women who voted for Trump, didn’t have a college degree. And this of course was supposed to imply that these women weren’t very smart to begin with. But being a curious type of fellow, I decided to check a few facts on that stat. Turns out, that when it comes to white folks, roughly 39% of white men have a college degree, while 62% of white women have one. Meaning the majority of america’s white women period, have collegiate degrees. 

Then I thought, welp, when it comes to the fallacy of less educated white women voting for Trump, let me buttress my former research by finding the source organization that “spun” this info. So, I found out the company responsible for putting out this propagandized non-sense was america’s “National Election Pool” (NEP). Now, the NEP is a group of news organizations (ABC, NBC, CBS, Fox News, CNN and the Associated Press respectively) that was formed in 2003 to provide “exit polling” stats for U.S. elections. And it replaced the “Voters News Service” that was dissolved in 2002.

And right after the NEP opened its doors, election officials found they “cooked” and “skewed” numbers in the 2004 and 2016 presidential elections. So, what this organization is really in the business of, is reporting “half-truths” instead of exit polls.

Additionally, I found another tid-bit of info. I hadn’t known before.

My research showed that Black men with collegiate Associates degrees number at 34%, while Black men with collegiate Bachelor’s degrees are at 36%. Meaning, there’s more Black men in america with Bachelor’s degrees than Associates degrees. And this is in addition to the research I’d done years ago, proving that there’s more Black men in college, than in prison. I’m tellin’ you, whoever coined the phrase, “knowledge is power” wasn’t lyin’.

Moving on…

So, the logical question, especially in light of the contemporary feminist-fueled #METOO movement(s), is why would white women vote a knuckle-draggin’ neanderthal like Don Trump into the american presidency, when one of their own kind was up for the position? And why would I say that the “Trumpster” is america’s greatest “feminist”?

Here’s why…

Cause even though the Don comports himself like a brainless brute, he understands white women implicitly, even if they don’t understand themselves.

Meaning, he knows that what america’s white women really want, is not equal parity with white men. What these recessive-traited, pin-thin lipped, flat-assed, and ghastly pale-skinned females want, is to enjoy all the privileges white fascism affords them, while pretending to be an oppressed minority.

PERIOD.

BLACK FEMINISTS TAKE NOTICE!

And speaking of Black feminists, recently I’d heard a song I haven’t listened to in years, and that was Annie Lenox’s, “Sisters are doin’ it for themselves”. Now, this song is an affront to me for a couple of reasons, but the main one is, notice that Annie didn’t say “women” are doin’ it for themselves, she said “Sisters/Sistas” are.

Meaning, while white feminists are telling Black feminists to despise their men and the Black patriarchy—which doesn’t exist, white women are voting the most heinously sexist man into the presidency of this country. And as part of this trick, white women continue baiting the hook of feminism, with promises of more inclusion into america’s white fascist social order for Black women. And if you wanna’ go even deeper into the feminist rabbit-hole, at it’s core, it’s telling Black women, we (white feminists) have white male sympathizers, and if you go to bat for us, you’ll have more access to them.

And that’s the biggest piece of cheese on the feminist rat-trap.

Now, if you happen to be a Black feminist reading this, who disagrees with me, let me ask you a question: name one thing white feminists have done for Black women, that they haven’t done for themselves?

I’ll wait.

And this question ain’t rhetorical—please, if you have an answer, I’d love to see it in the comment section, so I can show you how brainwashed you’ve allowed yourself to be.

Moreover, if you’re a Black “womanist”, you’re just pretending that you’re not a white fascist feminist.

Especially if you’re a “Pro-Black womanist”. Cause if you’ve studied our ancient ancestry for more than five minutes, you’ll notice that we never separated ourselves from each other. Meaning, Black Kings always had their Queens beside them. Any kind of “gender-warring” only started happening when our Diaspora adopted the tenets of white fascism.

So in conclusion, I’ll say this, america’s white women are no more scrupulous than their bigoted male counterparts—they’re just pretending to be. So, to any Black woman reading this, if you wanna’ be down with white fascism, just say that. But don’t try to con me with your feminist ideologies, that you’ll find, include some of the most heinous feats of ethnic cleansing known to “hue-man” kind.

And you don’t have to take my word for it, just google the name “Margaret Sanger” sometimes.

And like Sam L. Jackson said in Spike Lee’s movie, “Do The Right Thing”: “That’s the double truth, Ruth.”

Later…

MontUHURU Mimia

*Addendum—6/11/18: Fam, if you'd like to see the first blog post in this series, you can do that HERE.

P.S.

Here’s the video of Annie Lenox with Aretha Franklin singin’ “Sisters are doing it for themselves”. And keep in mind that Annie makes it a point not to use the phrase “womenor ladies” are doin' it for themselves, she uses the term Sisters”/Sistas. Cause she's really targeting Black women with this propagandized nonsense (That's why she's singing wit Aretha yall)—and while Black women hum along with this ditty, white women are teaming up with their men to maintain and secure the privileges they'll enjoy in america’s white fascist social mainstream.