The Cult of Black and white Cinematic Symbolism (Part 16)...What do Walt Disney, Michael B. Jordan, Barack Obama, Kehinde Wiley, Stephon Clark, the Hegelian Dialect and Ryan Coogler, all have in common?

 

To the readers of this Blog: the reason this post is a bit long-winded, is over the course of the last two weeks, I debated about which subject I wanted to tackle first. It was a toss up between Vanity Fair magazine’s controversial pic of Michael B. Jordan and Ryan Coogler, or Kehinde Wiley’s portrait of Barack Obama, or the shooting of Stephon Clarke. So I decided to put all 3 topics in this post. On that note, I ask you to indulge me regarding this editorial’s length, for the simple reason that all of these topics are inter-related. Now, as always, I’m writing with the reader in mind, so I’ve made sure this post’s structure gives you a comfortably fluid read. And I dare say, that there’s no way you’ll come to the end of this, without a nugget of knowledge you didn’t have before. So once again, I thank my audience for your kind indulgences.

--MontUHURU Mimia

Walter Elias Disney was born on December 5^th, 1901, in Chicago, Illinois, and was the fourth son of Elias Disney and Flora Call. In 1911, the Disney family moved to Kansas City, Missouri, and it was while attending “Benton Grammar School”, that a young Walter developed a love for drawing cartoons. 

Walter attended Saturday courses at the Kansas City Art Institute, and took a correspondence course in cartooning, with monies he earned from a paper route. In 1917, Walter’s father bought stock in Chicago’s “O-Zell” jello company, and moved the family back to the city as a result. And it was back in Chi-town, that Walter became the cartoonist for McKinley High School’s newspaper, while also taking courses at the Chicago Academy of Fine Arts.  

In 1918, Walt faked his birth certificate’s date, so he could join the Army. After successfully fooling armed forces personnel, Walt became a Red Cross ambulance driver. Shortly afterwards, he was shipped to France, and began drawing cartoons on the side of his ambulance for decoration. Recognizing his exceptional talent, Army administrators featured Walt’s work in the army newspaper “Stars and Stripes”. Returning to Kansas City in 1919, Walt worked as an apprentice at the Pesman-Rubin Commercial Art Studio. There, he drew commercial illustrations for advertising, theater programs, and catalogs. And there, he befriended his future business partner, Ubbe Iwerks.

In 1920, the Pesman-Rubin Art Studio laid off Walt and Ubbe. In response, they started their own business—the short-lived Iwerks-Disney Commercial Artists Studio. Unable to attract customers, Walt and Ubbe both joined the Kansas City Film Ad company. And this company produced commercials using the “cutout animation” technique. But after doing some research on other methods of animating, Walt saw that “cell animation” would be the most promising way to make his animated features. With this method in mind, he created a company with a friend he’d made in Kansas City, that went by the name, “Newman’s Laugh-O-grams”. And the earliest Laugh-O-grams, were adaptations of Paul Terry’s, “Aesops Fables”. And for the sake of brevity, you can google Aesops Fables, if you don’t know what they are.

In 1921, the success of “Laugh-O-grams”, led to the creation of the “Laugh-O-gram” studios. Additionally, it led Walt to hire employees he could delegate some of his work to. Unfortunately, the company still couldn’t turn a profit. As a result, Walt moved to Hollywood in 1923.

In Hollywood, Walt continued to struggle behind plying his trade, until he got a call from a New York film distributor, who was interested in his work. As a result, Walt and his brother Roy, formed the “Disney Brothers Studio” behind their success. Later, this venture would become the “Walt Disney Company”, to produce animated feature films.

In 1927, Walt grew tired of the work he was doing for the New York distributors. Thus, he and his company began to work on a character and a cartoon series called, “Oswald the Lucky Rabbit” for Universal Pictures. In 1928, Walt wanted to renegotiate his contract with Universal. What he soon learned was, not only were some of the top brass at Universal unwilling to pay him and his company higher wages, but they actually wanted to decrease their pay. And, Universal’s administrators threatened to produce the Oswald cartoon themselves, if Walt wouldn’t heed their demands. Also, the fact that Universal owned the rights to Oswald, didn’t help any. 

Desperate to find a character that could replace “Oswald”, Ubbe and Walt thought about a pet they’d adopted while they were in “Laugh-O-Gram” studios. This was a pet mouse. Now, originally Walt wanted to call this cartoon mouse, “Mortimer”—but thinking that was too pretentious, Walt’s wife Lillian, suggested the name “Mickey”. Thus, in 1928, the cartoon character, “Mickey Mouse”, made his first appearance in a cartoon short called, “Plane Crazy”. But it wasn’t until Walt and his company created the animated short, “Steamboat Willie”, featuring Mickey Mouse, that the character developed a successful following. Thereafter, Disney Studios signed a contract with Columbia Pictures for more of “Mickey’s” cartoons.

A few decades later, under Walt’s tutelage, Disney Studios would go on to create such notable animated features like Snow White and the Seven Dwarves (1937), Dumbo (1940), Fantasia (1940), Pinocchio (1940), and many other “classic” hits. In the 1950’s, Disney Studios would expand their brand by opening “Disneyland” and creating the successful TV show, “The Mickey Mouse Club”. And in 1965, the Disney Corporation started the development of the “Experimental Prototype Community of Tommorrow”, or “EPCOT” Center for short.Sadly, on December 15^th, 1966, Walt Disney died of lung cancer, at the age of 65. And after Walt’s death, an enduring legacy of animated films was left by him for you, me, and future generations to enjoy. Now, this is what white fascists want you to think—but let’s get to the straight dope of who this man really was…

Walt Disney was a 33^rd degree freemason. And to commemorate this, at Disneyland, there’s an establishment called the “33” Club. Additionally, he was a charter member of a freemasonic fraternity called the “Ordo DeMolay”—and coincidentally, two other members of this frat, just happen to be american president, Bill Clinton, and the movie actor, John Wayne. To top that off, Walt was a notorious pedophile, and his company had decades long ties with the american mafia, and the CIA. Lastly, it’s on record that the Disney Corporation has the largest homosexual employees organization in the entertainment industry. And mind you, this man’s company, is the same one that put out Marvel’s “Black Panther”.

Now, early last month, Vanity Fair, put out this pic of Black Panther Director Ryan Coogler, and his muse, Michael B. Jordan (right). And as a result, “Black Twitter” (whatever that is), was peeved about this photo, saying it was too homoerotic. Now, if you wanna’ know my thoughts on whether or not this pic is emasculating, especially to Ryan, here’s my answer…

HELL YEAH IT IS!!

No straight brotha would let another man “palm” his head, in this suggestive a manner. Here, it looks like Ryan’s being guided downward to fellate his friend. And that’s what it’s meant to look like. Also, as par for the course, whitey’s media is obsessing on what’s being called Black men’s "collective homophobia", in regards to this pic.

Now, I wasn’t planning on this, but regarding this pic and whitey’s media, I gotta’ list 3 points I need to make about the role white gays play in furthering the agenda of white fascism…

Point#3: If you’re a Black person who’s offended by this pic, then you’re missing it’s true agenda…

And that means what? It means that we should expect this kinda’ sexually-conflicted crap from artists associated with ‘Disney Studios”. Cause knowing Walt belonged to white fascist freemasonry, we should understand that he was tasked with mainstreaming homosexuality—especially to children. And with that end in mind, Disneyland annually sponsors a “Gay Day”, for its amusement park. And on this day, Mickey Mouse and Donald Duck peruse the park, passing themselves off as gay lovers. So please don’t think this company is gonna’ invest hundreds of millions of dollars on Marvel’s Black Panther, without pushing that part of the white fascist agenda through this film. And even though there’s a lot of subversive symbolism in the actual movie, I knew that was just the tip of the iceberg. Thus, the gay pic featuring Mike and Ryan.

Point#2: What white fascists will never talk about, is how gays reproduce themselves…

Now, you might be thinkin’, bruh—this point don’t make no sense. First off, why would anyone broach this question in any form of media, since we know gays can’t have children. At least not naturally. And I totally get that. But the reason I'm bringing this up is, whitey knows once this conversation gets started, they’re gonna' have to talk about the childhood traumas that go into making someone gay.

See, whitey will talk about accusations of “Black male homophobia” from here to Gibraltar, but if they ever get around to how queers create other queers, they’d have to talk about the rampant amount(s) of sexual molestations and abuses that inevitably precede someone calling themselves a homosexual.

And this fact leads us to…

Point#1: Whitey won’t talk about traumas preceding homosexuality, cause then they’d have to admit that homosexuality is UNNATURAL.

Now, I don’t want anyone reading this post to take my word for this, so do your own research into the childhoods of any homosexual. Cause when you do, you’ll find the trauma that made them sexually-conflicted. And if this fact becomes mainstreamed, then the gay lifestyle couldn’t be sold as effectively to the proletariat, and whitey couldn’t try to shame Black people, and Black men specifically, into thinking that queers were born with specific genes, that make them that way. 

And speaking of queers, I’ll remind everyone that on February 12^th, of this year, the painter Kehinde Wiley unveiled his portrait of this country’s 44^th President, Barack Obama. (*Note: Obama was not america’s first Black president. Look up the name “John Hanson” sometimes. He was a Black man and this country’s first president, under the “Articles of Confederation” which preceded the Constitution. And he’s portrayed on the back of america’s $2 dollar bill—which is probably why they took it out of circulation.)

Now, as you can see, President Obama is seated in what looks like a garden (And Barack’s “hand-over-hand” gesture is freemasonic, by the way. Just like the pic next to it of Nava “Barak”, wife of Ehud “Barak”, former Prime Minister of Isreal. And we not only see Nava’s hand-over-hand sign, but her earring has the emblem of the Masonic “Double-headed Eagle”. And you can always click on my pics to make them larger). With that said, let’s further break down the symbolism embedded in this painting…

First off, the color “green” is used to represent “melanin”.

And I can almost hear people thinkin’—bruh, that don’t make no kinda’ sense. Well, it does when you consider that chlorophyll is what gives plants their green color, just like melanin is what makes our skin Black. Additionally, the ancient kemetic Netcher Ausar (left), was depicted on pyramid walls with “green” skin. At the same time, Ausar also went by another name—and that was: “LORD OF THE ‘PERFECT’ BLACK” (which is DOPE by the way). 

Additionally, the Marvel superhero, “The Hulk”, represents the Black phallus. Now, I can hear all the boos and hisses behind this theory. But ask yourself, what color is the Hulk's skin? Exactly. And when Bruce Banner's aroused or enraged, he grows to three times his size until he transforms into this character. But another clue as to who this character's supposed to represent, is the Hulk wearing “purple” pants. Now, every Black person has heard someone say that a heavily melanated brotha or sista is, “blue, Black, purple”, well that's the reason Marvel’s comic book creators, chose that pants color for this superhero (Alice Walker’s, “The Color Purple”). Cause again, he represents the white man’s fear of a Black phallus.

But the garden scene, is ultimately meant to effeminize Barack, and that's also why he's “seated” in the painting. Cause what this painting's really showing, is how whitey has a problem with “erect” Black men.

Meaning, white fascists know that a Black man’s erection, especially in sexual terms, has the power to breed them and their kind out of existence. Additionally, a mentally and spiritually erect Black man, has the most power to lead himself and others away from internalizing the tenets of white fascism (i.e. J. Edgar Hoover’s threatening “Black Messiah”).

Now recently, I also read about Tamar Braxton (left), Toni Braxton’s sister, cutting off all her hair. And at first, I was like—nah, that’s just a rumor. Cause I knew how infatuated she was with blonde weaves and wigs. Then I saw the above picture. But instead of being shocked, her actions actually made sense. Here's why—whitey knows that since the Black Panther movie came out, more and more Black women are doting on the “Dora Milaje” (DM). And when you think of them, what’s the first mental image you see?

A bald Black woman.

Now, here’s how this fits into the white fascist narrative. whitey understands that for Black women to remain in 3 states of being: well-paid, oversexed and alone, it’s best to have them looking like hypermasculine “she-males”. Thus, the bald heads.

And mind you, I understand Black women see the DM as strong, smart and fiercely independent, but what Black women really need to understand is, the world’s men see the DM as the exact type of women they’d never marry or be in a long-term relationship with. Cause they look too much like men themselves.

And, if you look at the Marvel comic series, “World of Wakanda” (right), there’s a running theme of homosexuality throughout its pages.

So ultimately, this is another way whitey intends to promote the gay lifestyle to Black men and women. Cause again, we have the most genetic power to breed them out of existence. So the last person white fascists want Black women dating, marrying, and having children with, is a Black man. And vice-versa.

Now, onto the “Stephon Clark” shooting…

So, I’m guessing if you’re a Black man or woman reading this, then you know about what happened to Stephon Clark. And if you’re not a Black man or woman, you shouldn’t be reading this Blog anyway, cause this message isn’t for you. And if you don’t like me saying that, please stop reading this and go find another Blog to amuse yourself with. Now, for the rest of us who’ve heard of Stephon, I’m not gonna’ go into the gory details of what happened to him on the night of March 18^th, of this year, in Sacramento, CA. But I will tell you how this fits within the white fascist narrative of the “Hegelian Dialect” (HD).

Now, conspiracy theorist and CIA agent, David Icke, calls the HD a white fascist methodology consisting of 3 parts, and those are: problem, reaction, and solution.

And I’ll tell you—the main reason this story is getting so much publicity, is because of Marvel’s Black Panther movie. And again, Marvel Studios is owned by Disney.

Now, you might be sayin’, wait a sec’ bruh—that sounds like some hair-brained theory you came up wit’ last night. Well if you think that, let me list you reasons why Stephon’s life was cut short, and why whitey specifically chose his story to put out to the public, using the HD.

Part#1: Problem

Love it or hate it, Marvel’s Black Panther movie is expelling so much positive energy for Black people, and Black americans especially, that whitey knows, if this movie’s effects on us go unabated, we’ll continue to harness that energy. And that could potentially keep us out of the self-hating mind-state they’ve fought so hard to keep us in. See, any time we feel proud about ourselves, that pride has the potential to unify us. And whitey knows that’s the only virtue that will help us defeat them.   

Part#2: Reaction

To diffuse the Black Panther’s positive influence on Black americans, once Stephon Clark is shot multiple times, whitey's media quickly makes it front page news. And within hours, Stephon Clark becomes a household name. So with this action, white fascists have effectively swapped the positive energy and pride we felt over the Black Panther movie, with fear and self-loathing.

Part#3: Solution

And it gets worst—cause whitey’s gotta’ make sure our self-hating "spell" isn’t broken over time. See, they know that any group of people will forget an incident that doesn’t directly affect them, in a matter of days or weeks. So the real reason they’re throwing so much publicity at this story, is cause white fascists understand the divisive value of Stephon’s “tweets” that castigate Black women (and if you haven’t read these tweets, just google them). And their plan worked. Cause as I’m writing this, Black men and women are too busy “gender-warring” to realize the game that’s being played on them. And in more layman’s terms, Black men and women are at each other’s throats again, which is right where whitey wants us. Proof, that the good ol’ DIVIDE AND CONQUER technique still works.

So I’ve said all that to say this: NOTHING, and I mean NOTHING is gonna’ help us defeat white fascism except UNITY!

PERIOD.

And our battle with white fascism is one we can’t buy or educate our way out of, cause those are resources they control. Meaning, whatever currency we have an abundance of, or whatever kind of degree we get, whitey can devalue. Now, I’m not knockin’ money or education, but the only way these things are gonna’ work towards our collective benefit, is though UNITY.

Now, I’m not only a Black Nationalist, but I’m a realist also. And I know good and well, that anyone over 30 ain’t really trying to hear any talks about changing themselves, so our people can be more unified. So what I propose, like I’ve done several times in the past, is that we turn the focus of these kinds of initiatives towards our children, in the form of homeschooling, or truly independent schooling. Meaning, we should pull our children out of public and charter schools (which are still state-owned schools anyway), and give them learning environments where they won’t be poisoined with the same self-hating cirriculums that I, or we got, going to P.S. whatever-number school, where we live. And I will dedicate a series of posts to homeschooling in the near future. Promise.

So in conclusion, and as always, I’ll tell you that the proposition of Black unity is simple, but it’s not easy. Cause the social orders we currently live in are engineered towards keeping us apart and hating ourselves. But embracing the hardest initiatives, is what yields the best rewards. So by any and all means necessary, let’s get to work. NOW!

Later…

MontUHURU Mimia

*Addendum: 4/13/18--In regards to the cartoon superhero, “The Hulk”, and how he truly represents the “Black phallus”, the NEGUS/scholar/YouTuber “LLO525STAR” curated the video below. And this clip delves much more deeply into where The Hulk's mythological origins really come from. Enjoy.

And if you'd like to see a larger version of this vid, you can do that HERE.

The cult of Black and white cinematic symbolism (Part 14)...The Black Panther's "Dora Milaje", Harriet Tubman's 20, and the white fascist attack on Black femininity...

To the readers of this Blog: Once again, I must apologize about the sparsity of posts here as of late. Now, sometimes life does get in the way of me facilitating and curating this space, but that's not an excuse, cause everyone's busy. Conversely, just cause I'm absent from this forum, doesn't mean I'm not thinking about it in some way, shape or form. So I do have a back-log of subjects I wanna' tackle. Now, some of my forthcoming editorials may sound dated, cause I've been away, but trust that the reason I'm committing my time to them is cause I must. I've never been one to write about frivolous topics, and I'm not about to start now.

And as always, to the people who cared enough to check back on my blog from time to time, I say thank you, thank you and thank you.

--MontUHURU Mimia

Law #5: So much depends on reputation—guard it with your life.

--Robert Greene, from the book “The 48 Laws of Power”

In 1820, Harriet Tubman was born Armanita “Minty” Ross, in Dorchester County, Maryland, to parents, Harriet “Rit” Green and Ben Ross.

 

Now, the dilemma I've run into while writing Harriet's bio is this: the more research I do on the “Transatlantic Slave Trade” in america, the more I find out that 90% of it was pure fiction. For example, several of the “slave ship” diagrams, like the one to the upper left, that supposedly illustrate how we were “transported” here from Africa, were found by Black scholars to be completely false (and you can always click on my pics to enlarge them). And I'll definitely site examples of this, in a forthcoming post I'll write on this topic.

But according to a multitude of Black scholars, there's no way these ships could hold this many people on them, while traveling across the Atlantic for months, or close to a year at a time.

So that says what?

It says that the above illustration, is JUST A PICTURE!

MEANING, IT HAS NO BASIS IN REALITY!

Well, let me rephrase that—the “slave ship” graphic is more than just a “picture”—it's a propagandized mental trigger, that's meant to keep any Black man and woman looking at it, hating themselves for being descendants of lowly, conquered slaves. It's a “Psy-op” y'all. And might I add, it's one of the most effective ever created.

And I liken this to the “Flat Earth Theory”. In so much as, what matters more than it being true of false, is white fascists knowing how much control they have over the minds of the proletariat (us). Meaning, whitey wants to know that they can give us one reality, and then switch it on a dime, to see if we'll go for it.

Also, another fact that leads me to believe that nearly all of the Black “Transatlantic Slave Trade” (TST) was bogus, is that I was never taught about the “Barbary Slave Trade” alongside it. Now, for those who don't know, the Barbary Slave Trade was one where the Black North African “Berber” tribes, enslaved some two million white people, at the same time the TST was happening. So question: why are we always taught about the TST, but never the Barbary Slave Trade?

Here's why...

If Black people, and Black children especially, knew about the Barbary Slave Trade, then we wouldn't think we were the world's only slaves. Thus, we'd be prouder and less self-hating—so we couldn't be as easily manipulated or mind-controlled.

See, the only way whitey wins over us, is by making sure we hate ourselves.

PERIOD.

And if they can do that, white fascists know we'll never UNITE—and that's the only way we're ultimately gonna' beat 'em. 

Additionally, over the course of the last decade, I've found out that we, Black people, were the world's first inhabitants on EVERY CONTINENT OF THIS EARTH! So why would we be shipped from Africa, when we were here already?

But let's get back to sista Harriet...

(white) Historians say Harriet “escaped” to Philadelphia, and then immediately returned to Maryland to “rescue” her family. And it's said that one group at a time, she brought relatives with her out of the state to “freedom”. And traveling by night on the “underground railroad”, it's said Harriet “never lost a passenger”.

Now, after the Civil War began, Harriet worked for the Union army. First as a cook and nurse, then as an armed scout and spy. It's also said that she was the first woman to lead an armed expedition in the war, when she guided the raid at “Combahee Ferry”, which is said to have freed more than 700 “slaves”. And after Harriet's death in 1913, she's become an icon of american courage and freedom.

Now, it struck me as funny that Harriet's once “illegal” slave-freeing activities, which had her labeled as public enemy #1, lead to her becoming an armed scout, spy and the first woman to lead a battle in america's Civil War. But then I noticed something in a picture featuring Harriet that kinda' showed me the advantage she might've had when and if she actually made this transition.

Meaning—Harriet Tubman was a white fascist freemason.

Now, I can already hear the jeers behind my saying this—and I can also hear people once again proclaiming, bruh—you say that about everybody. But what tipped me off was Harriet's hand gesture in the above photo. And if we do a bit of a comparison between Dr. Umar Johnson's hand gesture and Harriet's, you'll notice the same interlocked fingers and pyramid shape that both their thumbs make (And you can click on this pic to make it larger).

Now, let me also state, that my saying this about Harriet, in no way, shape or form, takes away from the noble work she's alleged to have done. Several narratives I've heard about her, say that if you didn't agree to leave with her on the “freedom” trail, she'd gun you down on the spot. That's gangsta. But I need you to also understand, that every time her name is mentioned, the first thought that comes to your mind, is Black slavery.

So, at this point, you might still be thinking, bruh—I still ain't convinced Harriet was any kinda' freemason, and I ain't gonna' be.

Okay, lemme give you one more reason I'm inclined to think Harriet was down wit' tha' freemasons.

Back in April of 2016, Obama's Treasury Secretary, Jack Lew, said Harriet would appear on the new version of america's 20 dollar bill. It was widely announced that it would be the first time that a Black woman has ever appeared on any U.S. currency. However, when Harriet's 20 was brought up a year later, Jack stated: “Ultimately, we will be looking at this issue, (but) it's not something I'm focused on at the moment.”

Now, don't get me wrong, the Harriet 20 was said to be slated for release in the year 2020—so, it might very well become a reality. But a person, renowned abolitionist or otherwise, doesn't get this kinda' recognition, unless they're connected to freemasonic networks. But let me get to the point of why they'd elect to put Harriet on america's 20 dollar bill—it's cause white fascists figure, Harriet's likeness on the bill, will get Black women to buy more consumer goods with it.

PERIOD.

And at this point, you might be thinking, what the heck does this have to do with Marvel's “Black Panther” movie and the “Dora Milaje”?

So let's get into that right quick...

Now, I can't tell you how many times I've heard Black women, on or off TV, say they love Marvel's Black Panther movie, cause the Dora Milaje (DM) represent powerfully strong and independent Black women, who are their male counterparts equal in every way. And if you're a Black woman reading this, they can serve as a great source of pride to you and your woman friends, looking at it from that perspective.

But let's examine what message white fascists are sending to the world about Black women via the DM.

At one point in the Black Panther film, the DM are referred to as “Grace Jones look-a-likes” (that's a pic of Grace to the left). Now, let's break that statement down real quick—Grace Jones was a runway model, and a (dope) musical artist, who was known for looking “hyper-masculine”. And I can remember watching a videotaped musical performance of hers, curiously titled: “Grace Jones: A One Man Show”.

Now, Grace enjoyed the height of her stardom in the 80's, and ever since then, it seems like every Black female runway model has been a clone of hers. Meaning, Black female models, (and I'm speaking strictly of ones who adorn fashion runways), are for the most part, exceptionally dark-skinned and have exceptionally short hair. One example of this would be the fashion model, Alex Wek (upper right pic).

Fast forward to 2018, and we have the lovely women of the DM who are all dark-skinned, bald-headed, and hyper-masculine sistas, who're carrying spears.

Now, I need to make one thing emphatically clear about the DM, and more specifically about Danai Gurira and Letitia Wright (right pic), and that's this: I personally think these sistas are gorgeous. They've got flawless skin, lovely physiques, and they're always ladies in public—but by european standards of beauty, these women would be considered unattractive.

And let me just repeat that, so you understand what I'm NOT SAYING. I myself, am not saying these sistas are unattractive, I'm saying by european standards of beauty, that's how they'd be perceived.

Now, the question that should pop into your mind is this: bruh, why are you concerned with european standards of beauty?

And the answer is, I'm NOT—consciously—but what am I thinking subconsciously?

Understand, since I've done the subconscious work to rid myself of european beauty standards, I can truly say I see past them, but don't get me wrong, getting (and staying) at that point involves a daily meditative practice, or else my anglophilic instincts will return. I'm referring more to the overwhelming majority of us who don't even recognize the problem at that level. I'm asking, how could that Black person, or those Black people, SUBCONSCIOUSLY, not think of these sistas as unattractive? And forget about other ethnic groups, cause you already know how they feel.

Ultimately what I'm getting at is this: the way white fascists have depicted the DM, is sending 3 very distinct messages to not only Black men, but to the world's men about Black women—and they are...

Message#3: Black women's physical aggression, means they're also sexually aggressive and insatiable.

What we see in Marvel's Black Panther movie, is the hyper-masculine looking DM physically fighting men in battle. And that coupled with what's been termed as the “Angry Black Woman Syndrome”, suggests to the world's men that Black women are too physically and verbally combative to be in long-term relationships or marriages. So white fascists are sending the message that the world's men should only look to Black women for sex, and nothing more.

Now, I can hear a multitude of Black women saying, “Well, what about Wonder Woman?” And I agree she's physically fighting men in her movie as well. But not only does Gal Godot still look like a woman, but we've been told our whole lives that the white woman is the most exquisitely feminine female on the planet (by european standards)—so they don't have the same “hyper-masculine” stereotype to contest with.

Now, I know a lot of Black women reading this will think: well, that's just this brothas opinion, it's not all that serious. And if you are, I'll direct your attention to an article former “L.A. Times” journalist, Sandy Banks wrote, pertaining to this topic.

Now, Sandy's a Black woman, who wrote an article asking why it's so hard for a “professional” Black women to find comparable mates in Black men. And the conclusion she drew was there just wasn't enough “quality” Black men to satisfy the needs of america's Black women—and she asked the public to voice their opinion on the matter. Welp, a “white middle-aged” man named Alan, wrote in with his opinion, and here's his two cents on the matter: "Any male, black or not, would be intimidated by the loud, raucous, foul-mouthed 'braying' of so many black women. They are often offensive in the extreme, obese or have a tendency to be so, and challenge the masculinity of any male."

And I'll leave a link for that particular article at the end of this post.

Message#2: Black women should always trust that a white male will be their saviors, no matter how much whitey's abused them in the past.

Now, understand that “Wakanda” is an African nation in hiding, cause they don't wanna' suffer the “ravages” of (white) colonizers. But “Shuri”, T'Challa's sister, nurses a white male “CIA agent” (Everette Ross) back to health, and the white colonizer is so grateful, that he helps Wakandans fight against other colonizing factions who are trying to overthrow their government. 

So the moral of that story is, any and every white man, up to and including a darn CIA agent, can rely on a Black woman to assist them in any and every circumstance or situation. Mind you, in real life, white missionaries would come to Black nations, or island nations, with resources like food and clothing for our people, to win over their trust, before they sent in the armed troops to overthrow their gov't. Also, white missionaries had a predilection for a particular style of sex they'd have with native women—and this is where the term “missionary position” comes from.

Now, it goes without saying that the “Disney” corporation, wouldn't put that truth on screen, so we have to be savvy enough to see that for ourselves. Thus, in accordance with history, what Shuri should have done when she had that white CIA agent on the “operating” table, was kill him. Cause in reality, a white fasicst's “soft touch” always comes before they pull out tha' machete. And finally...

Message#1: A Black woman's beauty will never equate to a white woman's.

Now, that's the bottom line to all this, in regards to why the DM are portrayed as bald-headed, spear-carrying woman warriors, who look like they wanna' be men, instead of being with one. Ultimately, both Black men and women have to be kept thinking that european standards of beauty will always trump any other kind of beauty standard, so we can always feel inferior to whites. 

And whitey does this in an effort to keep Black men and women apart, cause we have the most genetic power to breed them out of existence.

PERIOD.

Moreover, what the DM really represent is the white fascist attack on Black femininity. Now, I can hear some Black men saying, bruh—what kinda' “simptatstic” crap is that? So for brothas who think I'm just saying this to pander to a Black female demographic, lemme break this sentiment all the way down...

white fascists have a vested interest in keeping Black women in 3 perpetual states of being, and those are: well-paid, oversexed and alone. And here's why...

Because Black women have the most genetic power to breed whites out of existence, white fascists have her perpetually slated to be the world's greatest consumer—and what does that mean? Well, let's break this statement further down with a little “Q&A”...

Question: why are Black women the most overweight demographic in america?

Answer: Cause whitey understands that conditioning Black women to hate Black men, while portraying Black women as fiercely hyper-masculine, will make every kind of man think she's cold, combative and ultimately unapproachable. Thus, whitey knows that the affection(s) Black women are missing in their personal lives, will result in them seeking out solace in “consumer goods”.

Now, you might be thinking: so what the hell does that have to do with Black women being overweight? Simple—when Black women feel alone and “unloved”, whitey knows she'll compensate for that by buying more cloths, cars, jewelry, expensive trips, and ultimately, buying and consuming more food.

So “sweets” become a replacement for a lack of loving relationships.

Now, a Black woman reading this might be thinking, hold up—what kind of simple psychological B.S. is this? Everyday I see commercials endorsing white men being with Black women—so again bruh, this is just your opinion.

Okay, let's tackle that real quick...

Yes, it looks like on every commercial, or TV show that whitey's pairing Black women up with white men. And the reasons for this are, again, Black women have the most genetic power to breed whites out of existence, so the last person they want her to marry and produce children with, is a “pure-bred” Black man. But then you have to ask yourself, why would whitey go out of his way to portray Black women as hyper-masculine and unattractive?

And the answer is: so white (and non-Black men) can see Black women as sex toys (Olivia Pope) and not wives. Thus, keeping them alone. This is what I call the “white fascist fake-out”, cause one promise is offered, but what actually happens is meant to have the opposite affect. It's just like Harriet's 20 dollar bill—in so much as, when the bill was announced, Black women at that moment, felt proud to go out and spend more dollars, but when asked about the bill a year later, the former Treasury Secretary said: “...it's not something I'm focused on at the moment.”

And if the bill does come out, you'll know it's intended purpose.

So, I've said all that to say this, Black women, even though the DM look like they're representing “strong” Black females, they're actually meant to have you looking like undesirable “she-males” to the world's men.

Thus, what's ultimately gonna' save you Black woman, is your femininity, not feminism. 

Understand that your “reputation” is precious, so you should fight fiercely to protect it by understanding that no man thinks you're physically weak, so you don't have to go around proving that you're not. What you need to show men, is your more demure, quiet and soft-spoken side, and this is especially true around Black men.

Why?

Cause quiet as it's kept, the barometer of how any woman will treat other men, is how she treats her own man. Now, if she's hell-bent on being abrasive, foul-mouthed and disrespectful around her own man, then other men feel she'll be disrespectful to them. Thus, these women will be seen as a one-night stand, rather than someone who's a possible wife or life partner.

And to the Black women reading this, understand that the same white feminists who are getting you to hate Black men and everything to do with any kind of patriarchy, are the same ones who voted Donald Trump into office.

And that Black woman, should say it all.

Later...

MontUHURU Mimia

P.S.

Now, if you're a Black woman who thinks I'm totally lying about the white fascist assault on Black femininity, then peep this vid out. Literally yesterday, I came across this video explaining why Angela Bassett, would make a great “Killmonger”. Yeah, you heard right—these low-life miscreants were saying that Angela Bassett would make a great MALE VILLIAN!

Now, do you think they'd have said that about Gal Godot?

Anyway, why this vid just pissed me right off, is cause Angela, in my opinion, is not only the gold-standard of actresses, but she represents the kinda' sista every Black man wants to marry. She's physically beautiful, she goes out of her way to comport herself like a lady, she's got a regal air about her and she's exceptionally gifted in her vocation. She's the whole package.

But ultimately, white fascists thought she was TOO FEMININE for a Black woman. And that's why this video was made.

 

And if you'd like to see the Sandy Bank's “L.A. Times” article, you can do that here. 

P.P.S.

I couldn't rightfully end this post without showing one of the many reasons I think the “TST” is 90% fiction—so this vid featuring Tarik Taj Bey explains the absurdity behind the “slave shipments” of Black peoples to the americas. And a big shout out to “Kev” for reposting this vid on his YouTube channel. And, I apologize for this vid's lack of visual clarity, but I think it's message more than makes up for it.