The gospel of white fascism (Part 28)...What do ugly bowler hats, Buddhism, and Erykah's "BADU-ism" have in common?

Erica Abi Wright, better known as “Erykah Badu”, was born on February 26^th, 1971 in Dallas, Texas. And it's said that Erykah changed her name from its original spelling, because she felt it was a “slave” name. Thus, she adopted the moniker “Erykah”, saying the term “Kah” identifies her inner-self, while the surname “Badu” represents her favorite “scat” (vocal singing technique created by Jazz artists) sound. And among the “Akan” people of Ghana, Africa, the word Badu means: “10^th born child”.

Erykah's mother, Kolleen Maria Gipson, and her father, William Wright Jr., separated when Erykah was an infant, and both maternal and paternal grandparents stepped in to help raise her. And their nuturing helped a 4 year-old Erykah ply her singing and dancing trades at facilities like the “Dallas Theater Center” and the “Black Academy of Arts and Letters”.

At age 14, Erykah was “free-styling” for a local radio station with talents such as Roy Hargrove, before she attended the “Booker T. Washington High School of the Performaning Arts”. After graduating, she went to “Grambling State Univeristy”, a historically Black college. She left Grambling early to concentrate on music full-time, and concurrently, she held down an assortment of odd jobs, before landing a teachers position at the “South Dallas Cultural Center”. There she taught children the finer points of dance and drama, before working and touring with her cousin, Robert “Free” Bradford, with whom she cut a 19-song demo.

The demo titled, “Country Cousins”, landed in the hands of music mogul, Kedar Massenburg, and shortly thereafter, he recruited Erykah to sing a duet with R&B star “D'Angelo”. Kedar was so impressed with the young Erykah, that shorlty afterwards, he signed her to his record label.

Erykah's debut album, “Baduizm”, was released on February 11^th, 1997, and not only garnered critical and commercial success, but ushered in a new genre of music which Kedar Massenburg dubbed “neo-soul”. The album's lead single, “On and On”, was released before the Baduizm album, in January of 1996, and personally, the song wasn't only revolutionary sonically, but lyrically. I especially loved how Erykah used her feminine wiles to speak truth to power with the lyric, “Most intellects do not believe in God but they fear us just the same.”

Now, that lyric spoke to what made Erykah and her music so exquisitely dope. Her “earth-motherly” aura and style of dress which included head-wraps, long-flowing dresses and ankh rings, spoke to a spirituality that seemed peaceful and non-judgmental. In other words, she, to me at least, embodied the powerfully “conscious” sista aesthetic that every Black man is looking for in a life-mate.

She followed up “Baduizm” with the albums: “Live” (1997), “Mama's Gun” (2000), “Worldwide Underground” (2003), “New Amerykah (Part 1)” (2008), “New Amerykah (Part 2)” (2008), and a best-hits compilation called “Icon: The best of Erykah Badu” (2010).

Then Erykah got down wit' tha' freemasons.

Shortly thereafter, in 2012, she collaborated with an “alternative” white Rock group called the “Flaming Lips”, (Their biggest hit is a song called, “She don't use jelly”), on a re-make of the Roberta Flack song, “The first time ever I saw your face”.

Now, sonically, this song sounds entirely demonic—especially in comparison to Roberta's original version. And to accompany this song, was an insidiously distasteful (in my opinion) music video, where a Black woman sitting in a bathtub, is covered in what looks like blood and semen. Now, a lot of people, myself included, were thinking, what the hell is up with Erykah? Mind you, this was before I got some of the info. I currently publish on this Blog. But for those who aren't or weren't “in the know” about why Erykah would put out a vid like that, let me give you a bit of a primer on what that video really was...

Erykah's video for “The first time ever I saw your face”, was a freemasonic ritual played out in front of us. And the Black woman in the vid was not only supposed to represent her, but the woman's being covered in what looked like blood and semen was meant to display that Erykah was wholeheartedly committed to the freemasonic brotherhood, thus, she was pledging her “lifeforce” (blood and semen) to them. Concurrently, Erykah was performing what freemasons call the “whore of Babylon” ritual that's done with starlets who enter the freemasonic fold. And if you look at the pic above, you'll see artist (and I use that term lightly) Nikki Minaj, being made to perform this same ritual in the red dress (red again, representing blood). Note Erykah's Bowler hat and her hands in a pyramid shape in front of her vagina.

Now, for those of you thinking the “whore of Babylon” was just some wanton harlot-of-a-woman with loose morals, you should know that what she really represents is the goddess, “Ishtar”. And long story short, Ishtar (who some call Aphrodite), had huge appetites for both sex and war. Additionally, the term “whore” comes from the ancient Semitic dance called the “hora”—and the women who performed this dance were not lowly concubines, but “priestesses”. And this dance was said to rejuvenate older men experiencing some kind of sexual dysfunction, but it was also used to perform incantations. Meaning, the women who perform these rituals are engaging in “spell-casting” (meaning, especially in modern day terms, they're being used by white fascists to influence the masses—which is the very reason the construct of “celebrity” was created).

Additionally, as I mentioned earlier, Erykah's been wearing these ugly (in my opinion) “Bowler hats”, along with a lot of other celebrities. So let me tell you why this is happening...

The Bowler hat is said to have been designed in 1849 by London, England hat makers, Thomas and William Bowler. Now, in the 19^th and 20^th centuries, this hat had become popular with the working classes of Europe, but were most commonly associated with groups called “City Gents” (in the states, these would be “yuppies”), who worked in Europe's financial districts. But they were also commonly worn by members of an organization called the “Orange Order” pictured below.

Now, this fraternity is described as a “masonic type” brotherhood, sworn to uphold the Protestant Ascendancy. And in the picture, you clearly see the masonic regalia (white gloves and medaled sashes). So these tawdry hats are just one more way freemasons are identifying themselves these days. Just like in the Pharrell Williams pic above. Note that Pharrell's upwards finger point is also a freemasonic gesture.

Now, I vividly remember watching Tavis Smiley's show (yes, the same man who's currently being accused of sexual harassment—and is fighting it), where he was interviewing the rapper, “Killer Mike”. And Mike said, “...there's an old Buddhist saying, if you walk along a path or road on your journey and you meet your master, kill him.” And just a side note: Killer Mike was wearing the colors red, Black and white, which freemasons use to identify themselves, cause they represent the colors of the Nazi flag. I then recalled seeing pictures of Buddhas in episodes of “Love and Hip-Hop”, and in the background of pics featuring the masterful Black painter Kehinde Wiley, around a Black “conscious” YouTube personality named “King LO”, and most notably, in the background of YouTube videos of a conscious brotha who goes by the name “Blackmagik363” (pictured above left).

And just the other week, I met a brotha who I work with who recently converted to Buddhism after he was introduced to the religion through a friend.

Now, Buddhism is currently the fourth fastest growing religion in america—and I can vouch for this happening cause I see people wearing Buddhist wrist “beads” like it's going' outta' style. And the reasons for it's viral spread are myriad, but it's primarily to do with this religion's connections to meditation and the popular practice of Yoga. Now, even though this spiritual practice is most often associated with asians, it's roots are firmly entrenched in indigenous Black civilizations.

Don't believe me? 

Then check out this pic to the left. Now, the first statue in this triptych is one of a Buddhist Bust hailing from Thailand, and it dates back to 800 A.D. Now, you can't tell me that's not a sista. Also, the statue to the right of the African woman is one that dates back hundreds of years and is from central Vietnam—note how the Buddha's ears are elongated, just like this African sista's are. So, like every other religion (and science) on earth, fair and dark-skinned asians, got this practice from us. And if you'd like to enlarge this pic to see it more clearly, you can just click on it.

Now, remember when I said there are several reasons for Buddhism's rapid spread? Well, here's the main one: Buddhism is becoming more and more popular because it's associated with “fair-skinned” asians. Meaning, globally, fair-skinned asians are being given their “white status” which gives them more access to resources. Just like Irish-americans were given “freedom dues” and jobs on america's police forces.

And I'm saying this cause during the Ronald Reagan american presidency, fair-skinned asians received literally hundreds of billions of dollars for their years spent in american internment camps, after the bombing of Pearl Harbor. And for the past several decades stats show that there's been an acceleration of fair-skinned asians being approved for business loans by banks, simply because of their skin color. And they routinely use these loans to open businesses in Black neighborhoods. Conversely, Black people haven't received dime one of reparations for our years of captivity in the americas, and stats prove how we're rejected for bank loans at three times the rate of other ethnic groups strictly due to our ethnicity. And we also see nations like China receiving billions of dollars in government grants to buy up varying parts of Africa—and these are grants that Africans, who are native to the continent, won't and don't get.

And this is done cause, it wouldn't be in the best interests of white fascists to empower Black people, cause we have the most genetic power to breed whites out of existence. Especially at a time when white birth rates have fallen below replacement levels.

So ultimately, what do Bowler hat-wearing celebrities like Erykah Badu, and Buddhist practitioners have in common? It's their connection to the white fascists freemasons who control them.

And I've said all that to say this: understand, I'm not against freemasonry itself, cause these are just the sciences my ancient ancestors created and gave to the world—it's the dastardly white fascist spin on these sciences I can't stand.

So for anyone who still wants to know why I'm against white freemasonry, it's cause the tenets therein only empower destructive institutions that further prove the intrinsic wickedness of white people. Thus, every Black person should know that this is the only real contribution they can make to the world.

Later...

MontUHURU Mimia

When will Jesus return? (Special post-Christmas editorial)

Two nights before “Christmas”, a good friend invited me to one of his church's pre-holiday services. Now, this person understands that I'm not a christian, but being that we've known each other for decades, I agreed to attend.

So a few minutes into the service, the white female pastor declared that she was gonna' give everyone in attendance a “gift”. Now, this gift she said, was associated with us winning a lottery—and then she expounded on reasons why this lottery could only be attained through being “saved”—meaning, you'd have to be a person who's accepted “Jesus Christ”.

Then, she pointedly told us about the concept of “original sin” and how Jesus died for us because of that. Additionally, she said no matter how foul our mouths are, or how many banks we've robbed, Jesus died so we'd be cleansed of our inherited sin(s).

Finally, she ended the service by reinforcing the point that regardless of how egregiously we live our lives, our acceptance of Jesus will grant us everlasting life. Mind you, about half of the people seated and listening to that service, were Black.

Now, I understand how whoever's reading this is probably gonna' think—well, here comes the part where he talks about that whole Black and white/ethnic thing again. But in all fairness, this pastor's audience was mostly comprised of white people. However, in terms of how this woman's message could affect churchgoers, I'd like to make 3 points as to how this pastor's sermon might strike a Black churchgoer differently from a white one, based on our disparate kinds of conditioning.

Point#3: In terms of this white woman telling me that she's gonna' give me a “gift”, and how this includes my winning a “lottery” that comes from being saved—it immediately takes my mind to stories of the mythological “white savior” that will rescue Black people from themselves. And mind you, a white person could be (and was) sitting right next to me—but because white fascism teaches Black people from birth that we're the most vile and undesirable kinds of people on the planet, it says to my mind, that I need some sort of “external” white force to save me, or us, from our inevitable demise, due to our moral obtuseness.

Point#2: Doubling down on my last point, the concept of “original sin” reinforces to me, as a Black person, in regards to the conditioning that we specifically get (especially in the american educational system) that EVERYTHING about me is WRONG.

EVERYTHING. 

And on a side note, I remember speaking to a mature brotha like myself about the dysfunction of Black people. And the gist of his argument was that Black people need to take “personal responsibility” for reconditioning ourselves out of these dysfucntions/mind-sets. And I agree—to an extent. Meaning, recently, I spoke to a young brotha, who I know is 18 years old, and he just happens to have that beautifully flawless, deeply melanated skin I love. But because of this, his friends make fun of him and say that he looks “African”.

And he retaliates aggressively when they do. Meaning somewhere, at his young age, he's gotten the message that he should be ashamed of his association with Africa. Now, here's my question/argument for the aforementioned mature brotha I was debating—how in the world, can we expect this young man to recondition himself out of his conscious/subconscious hatred of his “association” with Africa (i.e. his dark skin), when he doesn't even know it's a problem? Then I told the brotha, if and when that young brotha does realize, that hating his skin is a problem, then how does he recondition himself out of it?

Another personal example of this, was the time in my 9^th grade class when a beautiful young sista said to me, when we were alone: “Damn—God didn't give us nothin', he gave us big lips and nappy hair.”

Now, check that out—she said, “God” didn't give us nothing. So, she was conditioned to think, in reference to her looks and being Black, that her very God had forsaken her. And ya' know what I said to this young sista? Nothing. Cause I felt the same way.

Fortunately, decades later, I feel completely different—and I hope she does too.

Mind you, there is a remedy for this—and that is, we have to get those young minds into “Black Nationalist” homeschooling collectives, so they're not poisoned with self-hatred from this social order's “mis-educational” system.

Point#1: And the number one point I want to make is this: ever since I was in my pre-teens, I've gotten the message that when the white christ returns, he'll set the world right again.

Now, because of the conditioning I got, especially in catholic schools, I should be able to agree with this sentiment. Fortunately though, I have alternate information (cause I'm a practitioner of the Black Spiritual Sciences), and I understand one profound truth that you won't hear in 99.9% of the church services you'll attend. And that's this: In regards to Jesus Christ, what white fascists don't want you to know is...

JESUS NEVER LEFT.

Now, you're probably thinkin’, bruh—if you’re agreeing that Jesus is real and was here, then how could you possibly say he never left.

Here's how...

The Black Spiritual Sciences (The Orishas, Ifa, Yoruba, Santeria, Voudun/Voodoo, etc.) teach us that the “Krist” (KRST) energies associated with these practices, are different from a physical man named “Jesus Christ”, who white fascists made up.

Now, for the sake of brevity, I'll tell you that “Jesus Christ” was an invention of the ruler “Constantine”, when he convened the “Council of Nicea” in 325 A.D. And coincidentally, it was here that 318 Roman Catholic Bishops wrote, decreed and sanctified the institution that we now know as “christianity”. And please don't take my word for this—go do your own research and find out for yourself.

Moreover, in terms of fascist dogmas and institutions, I think these Bible verses pretty much tell you the agenda of white fascist christianity/freemasonry.

Ephesians 6:5-8:

5:”Slaves, obey your earthly masters with respect and fear, and with sincerity of heart, just as you would obey Christ.”

6: “Obey them not only to win their favor when their eye is on you, but as slaves of Christ, doing the will of God from your heart.”

7: “Serve wholeheartedly, as if you were serving THE LORD, NOT PEOPLE.”

8: “Because you know that the Lord will reward each one for whatever good they do, whether they are slave or free.”

Now, I think that pretty much says it all.

So, and I'm talking exclusively to Black people, when our ancestors spoke of the “Krist/KRST”, they were speaking of energies to be accessed through the Spiritual Sciences I mentioned earlier.

And the bottom line to all these sciences is this: when you find a technique that combines your intention (prayer), with your subconscious mind, that's how you'll ultimately start to manipulate “spiritual” forces in your favor.

Then YOU will become the “CHRIST/KRST”.

Moreover, because our ingenious ancestors taught us that this particular energy is WITHIN you, it means you don't have to look for any external force to activate it—so you can save yourself.

So, while you imbibe in copious amounts of egg-nog and pumpkin pie on this holiday (holy-day), understand it's real meaning—and that is to heed our ancestors who're beseeching us to turn our KRST ENERGIES ON—so you can indeed live an abundant life that will not only benefit you, but the whole of the Black Diaspora.

And like Sam L. Jackson said in Spike Lee's movie: “Do the Right Thing”: “That's the double truth, Ruth.”

Later...

MontUHURU Mimia

The cult of Black and white Cinematic Symbolism (Part 12)...What do social engineering, sexual harassment charges and superhero movies have in common?

William Moulton Marston was born on May 9^th of 1893, in the town of Saugus, Massachusetts. He was a psychologist, inventor, comic book writer, and the creator of the comic book super-heroine, “Wonder Woman”.

He was educated at Harvard University, graduated “Phi Beta Kappa” and received his B.A. in 1915, an L.L.B. (undergrad law degree) in 1918, and a PhD in psychology in 1921. After teaching at “American University” in Washington, D.C., and “Tufts University” in Medford, Massachusetts, he worked at Universal Studios, California in 1929, as the Director of Public Services.

Now, for all intents and purposes, Marston was a conservative sort of fellow—outwardly—but for the 1930's, he was a bit of an iconoclast, being that he not only had a wife, Elizabeth Holloway Marston, with whom he had two children, but he also had a “live-in” mistress by the name of Olive Byrne. And let me just say, “officially”, Olive was playing the role of “nanny” to Marston's children—“unofficially”, she was accompanying Marston and his wife in various acts of “intimate play”. But I'll give you a bit more details about that later...

Max Gaines, a comic book publisher who hired Marston as an “educational consultant” for “National Periodicals” and “All-American Publications”, the two companies that became “DC Comics”, first heard of Marston through an article appearing in “Family Circle”. And in that magazine Marston said there was “great educational potential” in comics. Mind you, this was the late 1940's were talking about—so almost from the comic book's inception, they weren't meant to merely entertain children, but to “educate” and “influence” them. Coincidentally, the first comic book published in america was called, “Famous Funnies”, and it was released in 1933. And if you've followed this Blog at all, you'll understand how white fascist freemasons revere the number “33” cause it relates to the 33 vertebrate in the spinal cord, leading up to an organ called the “Pineal Gland”. And according to them, this is where a person's “consciousness” is kept.

Now, at the time, the DC Comics roster was fronted exclusively by male super-heros like “Batman” and “Superman”, but Marston came up with an idea to create a superhero who could conquer with their minds, instead of their fists. When Marston told his wife, Elizabeth this, she said: “Fine—but make her a woman.”

And after Marston got the “green-light” from Max Gaines, he was tasked with saying he based Wonder Woman (WW) on the newly liberated, unconventional and powerful females of his day. Meaning, it was that generation of white women, who would be the ones spear-heading what we now know as “feminism”. In accordance with this, Marston wrote in a 1943 issue of “American Scholar” that: “Not even girls want to be girls, so long as our feminine archetypes lack force, strength and power...”

Now, I know I've said this ad nauseum, but “feminism” was nothing but a trick played on women, just like integration was a trick played on Black people to get our money into the pockets of white fascists (Mind you, I'm in no way equating feminism, with Black liberation struggles. You can't have the white privilege and call yourself an “oppressed minority” at the same time—sorry feminists).

So, I think it's fitting that I retell the reason(s) why white fascists thought up feminism—and it goes a little sumthin' like this: A mature white male aristocrat, on a Public Broadcasting Station (PBS), channel thirteen in New York, confessed to being in a conversation with a Rockefeller at some upper-scale party. The aristocrat, who bore a striking resemblance to George Soros, said the Rockefeller asked him: "What do you think of the “Women's Lib” movement (*Note:Women's Lib was the 1970's moniker for feminism). The mature aristocrat said, he thought it was positive for women to demand equal pay for equal work. The Rockefeller then explained how they “funded” Women's Lib—before he confessed this: “We couldn't tax half the population, if women were staying home, being housewives...we had to get them into the workforce to be able to tax that revenue." The Rockefeller then went on to explain, "Also, we knew with both parents out of the house, what would essentially be raising their kids would be the TV, so that generation and the following ones, would be more easily programmable than this one."

Now, let me tell ya' why this “trick” also fits the narrative of Marston and the creation of WW: it's noted that in many of the WW comics, WW is bound, gagged, and usually put in some sort of restraints—as is evident in the illustration above. Also note that in the comic book illustration besides the one where WW is tied and helpless, she ponders on being happily dominated by a mistress (You can click onto this pic to enlarge it). Mind you, this is the kind of “intimate play” that Martson would engage his “women” in behind closed doors. Now, the message WW's brand of implicit S&M sends is this: contextually, a woman's liberation is best tempered by some kind of social boundaries, or obedience to a higher authority.

So what does this mean for the modern day woman?

It means , the reason white fascists want today's women watching “Sex and the City” and “Scandal”, which glorifies the oversexed female, is these women are being made to think their hyper-sexuality is actually liberating them, when it's really doing two things: one, it's keeping these women out of long-term relationships and marriages, and two: because these women are being kept out of relationships and marriages, it keeps them more corruptible than not.

How, you ask?

Well, white fascists know that women who are oversexed are looked upon as less “marriage-worthy”, than a chaste woman would be. And when I use the word “chaste”, I don't mean virginal. I'm using chaste in the context of women who don't have dozens of sex partners. And if women are told that they should embrace promiscuity (Amber Rose's “Slutwalk”), then more and more of them will wind up creating single-parent households. So not only is the mother of this household gonna' have less inhibitions when it comes to sleeping around, but the children she bares, will more than likely be very promiscuous as well, and they'll most likely have less resources at their disposal, being that there's no father in the home. Also, especially in the case of young girls, there won't be a father in the home to give them the moral guidance to make better life choices, especially when it comes to choosing men. So more than likely, these young girls will grow up doing things they might not, if they had a stable, two-parent home to grow up in. So ironically enough, this woman, more than most, will always be looking for some kind of stability/security, and doing whatever's necessary to get it—thus, the “SlutWalk” lifestyle ultimately keeps women more complicit with america's status quo, not less.

Prove it, you say?

That's easy. I distinctly remember about a decade ago, on a TV news show, a journalist asked a white woman, if she thought there'd ever be a Black president in america. Unhesitatingly, this white woman said: “I think they'll be a woman president, before there's a Black one.” Fast forward to the 2016 presidential campaign of Hillary Clinton .

Now, after eight years of a “Black president” (Barack Obama), Hillary threw her hat in the political ring to be “executive-in-chief”. And it seemed that women, white women especially, had their moment to vote one of their own kind into office. Additionally, they had the numbers to do it—cause women make up more than half of america's population.

But overwhelmingly, white women voted for Donald Trump.

Why, you ask?

Here's the answer: what a woman desires most is SECURITY—period. Women feel they're at a physical disadvantage compared to men, so it makes them fiends for safety—whether it be physical, financial, or both. And, it's the reason why young women will always pick the “playa” over the nerd, who'll treat them like gold. Meaning, white women (and whites collectively) were scared to death when Obama took office, cause they felt we would finally treat them, like they've treated us historically. So when these same women had a choice of Hillary or Trump to vote for, they chose Trump—cause they felt he'd keep them physically safer, than Hillary could.

Got it now?

Moreover, they figured Trump would be better able to protect the sanctity of white womanhood. Meaning, they sensed Trump would use every resource at his disposal to uphold the white woman's status, as the world's prettiest and most exquisitely feminine female.

And how is this sentiment evidenced in WW's narrative?

That's easy too. It's most apparent in the utility of WW's “golden lasso of truth”. Meaning, this illuminated rope is supposed to force people who are bound in it, to confess their true feelings. And what truth does it ultimately want people telling? Especially men? Simple, WW's lasso is supposed to make men unable to help themselves in revealing the perceived truth that the white woman (WW) is the world's prettiest female. And this speaks directly to a woman's want for emotional security—especially when it comes to feeling attractive.

Don't believe me?

Then check out this poster to the left. Now if you look closely, you'll notice that the sword placed in front of Gal Godot as WW, doesn't reveal it's curved tip. You only see the sword's “mid-section”. Now, for those who can't read subtext, the sword is supposed to represent a fully erect phallus, that's why we don't see it's top. So this pic is depicting WW cozying up to a hard phallus, to perform some sort of oral act (Note how WW's lips are slightly separated).

Now, you're probably thinking, bruh—get your mind outta' the gutter. This is a movie poster for pre and post-adolescent fans. Actually no. Stats prove that the average comic book reader is a male, in his mid-30's. Additionally, if you look at this second graphic above, you'll see I turned the pic onto itself, thus, revealing more of this poster's sexual nature. When I “flipped” this poster and joined the two pics together, you'll see the two swords now look like palatial “pillars”. And between these pillars is “Paradise Island”, where WW comes from. So ultimately, what this pic says is the surest way to “paradise” lies between the pillars (or legs) of a white woman—WW. (Note how the curved outline encompassing this view of paradise island is shaped like a vagina. And if you wanna' know how these pillars relate to “freemasonry”, look up the term “Jachin and Boaz” sometimes).

(*Note: you can click onto any of these pics to enlarge them)

So now you may be asking, well, what the hell does this have to do with the recent deluge of “sexual harassment charges” against powerful men?

Okay—let's get into that right quick...

In the last couple of years, cinemas have been overrun by what I call, “comic book movies”. Meaning, these movies feature our favorite superheros, some of which I've mentioned here. Now, I've already told you the average comic book reader is a middle-aged man, and when these comic book movies roll out in theaters, they're usually accompanied by video games featuring these heros. And in terms of the “Star Wars” franchise, when 2015's, “The Force Awakens” movie came out, there was an accompanying video game (Star Wars Battlefront) and graphic novel (Star Wars: Darth Vader: Vol. 1) that were rolled out with it. So, it was essentially a three-pronged campaign.

Now, let me just cut to the chase to keep this post from being too long-winded (one commenter called my posts, “long-azz articles”—and they didn't use a “z”). So I'll say that white fascists have mainstreamed comic book movies to make and keep men, collectively immature.

And their doing this with the concurrent campaign of mainstreaming homosexuality, especially to Black men (that's why so much money is being spent on the Marvel comic book movie, “Black Panther”—but I'll comment on that in another post). And the bottom-lined reason to all this is, white fascists know that a man who's an immature homosexual, will be less likely to revolt against whatever social order he's currently living in.

And this feeds into the “sexual harassment” campaigns that are removing so many powerful men (Harvey Weinstein, Charlie Rose, Russell Simmons) from their positions. Ultimately, white fascists want men to choose femininity which they're gonna' condition us to believe is more powerful than our masculinity. Thus, men, like women, will be more complicit with their demands. So if they can pluck out the masculinity of most men, they can have generations of males who'll do as they're told. And with these sexual harassment campaigns, they're also getting men used to women being in charge, and having power over them.

Funny enough, when I saw the latest “Blade Runner” movie (Blade Runner 2049), I noticed how the commander of the film's protagonist, “Officer K” played by Ryan Gosling, was a woman—and her boss was another woman.

And you maybe thinking: so why do you think this campaign is aimed primarily towards Black men?

Simple. Cause we have the most genetic power to breed whites out of existence. So if more of us embrace homosexuality, they'll be less “pure-bred” Black men, with our genetic power in this world.

Additionally, if you notice, the white men who've been taken out of power by these sexual harassment claims, aren't fighting them. But Black men, namely Tavis Smiley and Russell Simmons are. And the reason that's happening is, whitey needs to keep a Black face on crime in order to be able to kill off huge swaths of Black men indiscriminately. So Tavis and Russ, who are themselves white fascist freemasons, have been tasked with showing women, that they are unrepentant in their alleged abuses of women—thus maintaining our status as “public enemy # 1”.

So I've said all that to say this: Black men, put down the darn comics and stop watching these dumb-founded super hero movies. Cause they're conditioning you to believe in “negro nerdom” (i.e. being an immature and emasculated Black male). And they're doing this with the promise that this type of Black male, will be less threatening and more socially acceptable than a strong Black man would.

But as long as you have the most genetic power to breed these inbreds out of existence, nothing will change the fact that one of us existing anywhere, is a threat to them everywhere.

And like Sam L. Jackson said in Spike Lee's movie, “Do the Right Thing”: “That's the double truth, Ruth.”

Later...

MontUHURU Mimia

P.S.

Here's the trailer for the movie, "Professor Marston and the wonder women", that speaks to the "intimate play" these three engaged in, and the sexual origins and inspiration for WW.

The gospel of white fascism (Part 26)...Trump's travel ban, DACA, ethnic cleansing and the price of loving whitey unconditionally...

When I first got into the work force, I distinctly remember working around a latino man who completely imbibed in Hip-Hop culture. Meaning, he dressed and spoke like a young Black man, and he listened to rap music almost exclusively. And I recall a day when one of our co-workers accused him of being “too Black”. This latino man then said, “I ain't Black, I ain't Black—I'm orange and white, that's why I'm alright.” I replied, “Well, you should join the klan then—they'll show you how white you are.”

A couple of years later, I recall catching an episode of the TV show, “Gangland”, on the History channel, featuring an outlaw biker gang called the “Mongols”. Now, these guys were basically founded and operated out of southern California, and this documentary told how the gang's first members wanted to join the “Hells Angels”. Unfortunately, they were rejected by the exclusively white Angels, cause they were latinos.

I'd also like to mention, that the Mongols got into a gang war with the Hells Angels. So they recruited “foot soldiers” from a local latino gang known as the “Surenos”. And oddly enough, the Mongols felt the Surenos weren't as “white” as they were—even though the Hells Angels made it abundantly clear to the Mongols, that they weren't white.

Now, here's the self-hating latino twist to this story...

Being that the Mongols felt the Surenos weren't as sufficiently white as them, they relegated the Surenos to lives of “serfdom”. Meaning, Mongols used Surenos to do and run errands they felt were beneath them.

But one thing Mongols didn't realize was this: Surenos were pretty much, a wholly owned subsidiary of a larger gang, who locals called the “mexican mafia”—but more officially, they were known as “La Eme”. Now, one day in a southern California motel, Surenos were dealing drugs for La Eme, and Mongol members just happened to be in the same motel. So thinking they had dominion over Surenos gangsters, the Mongols barged into their room, saw the drugs and demanded a “piece of the action”. When Surenos refused, an argument ensued and one of the Mongols pulled out a gun and shot a Surenos gangster dead. So what ultimately wound up happened was, the Surenos and Mongols found themselves at war with each other.

And the moral to this story is: these latino gangs fought behind trying to validate their “whiteness”, even though the Hells Angels years earlier, let them know they weren't white. So it's like I said so many times in the past—if you indulge in any kind of hatred, especially of people who look like you, it's ultimately gonna' result in a self-hatred. And it's too bad these latin gangsters had to find this out the hard way—but truthfully, it serves 'em right.

Moving on...

So several years after watching the aforementioned latino fiasco, I remember being on a lunch break and going to a certain eatery, where the cashier happened to be a dark-skinned asian man. When I got to the register to pay for my food, I saw right away that “habib” or whatever his name was, didn't particularly enjoy the company of Black people. So when I handed him a twenty, he gave me back a smaller bill for my change, that looked like someone had taken a bite out of it or something. When I demanded he give me a different bill, the curry-smelling arab said in a thick accent: “You people—you're always causing trouble.” So after I cursed him out, I told his manger that if he doesn't watch his mouth, he'd find a foot in his rear end—and I didn't use those words.

Years after that, I remember being in a pizza parlor, where I watched the store's wall-mounted, flat-screen TV. A “CSI”-type of dramatic show played, and on it was an episode where the main character was abducted by a group of swarthy, darker-skinned asians who threatened to kill him if their demands weren't met. And I thought to myself, man—they're still casting dark-skinned asian men as these stereotypical “muslim” terrorists.

Fast forward a decade later, to June 15^th, 2012, when President Barack Obama signed america's “Deferred Action for Childhood Arrival” (DACA) immigration policy.

This legislation gave latin immigrants who entered and/or remained in this country illegally as minors, a two year “deferment” from deportation. And on top of that, it allowed said immigrants to be eligible for an american work permit. And this year alone, 800,000 applicants, who've been dubbed “dreamers”, were enrolled in this program.

And laughably enough, Donald Trump, who half of latinos voted for, ended DACA.

So while Julio and 'em were yelling and screaming about the “Black” president not doing enough for their cause, the “Don” shut the whole damn thing down. And this was after Trump declared he was gonna' build a wall on the mexican border—which he wanted the mexican gov't to pay for.

And while we're talking about good ole Don, one more victory he had recently involved america's “Supreme Court” reinstating his “MuslimTravel Ban”. And this ban applies to the countries of Iran, Libya, Syria and Yemen.

Now, let me just say this: I've seen both fair-skinned and darker-skinned asians dote on white folks for the better part of my life, and now that fair-skinned asians especially, are being given their “white status”, especially in countries like Japan, you can't tell these people they're not “whiter” than Blacks.

So in the wake of all these deportations and their people being blocked from entering this country, here's my question to them...

How ya' like whitey now?

And if you happen to be a latino or asian person reading this, understand that not only could I care less about Trump blocking your access into this country, but I put on a big ole Kool-Aid smile, whenever I hear about one of you getting kicked out.

Additionally, I'll never forgot a scene in one of my favorite movies, Spike Lee's “Do the Right Thing”, where some mature brothas on the corner were debating about how fair-skinned asians and latinos can come to this country one year, and open two and three stores a year later, while Black people, who've been here for decades, barely own any kind of real estate in their neighborhoods. And one of the characters says: “Well, it's gotta' be because we are Black...” Then, another mature brothas steps in and says, “C'mon man, I'm tired of hearing that excuse.”

Turns out that the first brotha was right, cause gov't stats bear out the fact that fair-skinned asians and latinos are able to get business loans at twice the rate of Black people, simply based on their ethnicity. And I'll leave a link to a post I wrote bearing these disparities out, at the end of this one.

Also, I'll never forget an episode of the Tavis Smiley show, where the musical artist, Santana, was a featured guest. And when the subject of Barack Obama came up, Santana dipped into the farthest reaches of his anglophilic mind and said: “Well—Obama's in the white house—no more excuses brothers (Black men).” As if Obama's presidency was gonna' magically make centuries of white fascism, directed squarely at us, disappear.

Moreover, I recall Santana telling a story about when he bought a large home in a white neighborhood. Carlos said that some white person put a note in his mailbox saying, no matter how many records he sold, in his eyes, Carlos is still nothing but a piece of trash—and I'm sure whoever wrote the note used a word other than “trash”. So whenever I hear about the Immigrations and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE) deporting another truckload of latinos back over the border, I smile and drink a large glass of orange juice, knowing that one of the deportees probably picked the very oranges that went into my drink. And if the deportees themselves didn't pick those oranges, then one of their relatives probably did.

And while we're on the subject of deportation, everyone reading this should know that this year alone, ICE has deported more than 240, 000 “illegals”, and since Trump's been in office, that organization's removal rates have nearly doubled.

Now, I understand that some will be offended by my use of stereotypes when it comes to dark-skinned asians and latinos—and you know what I say to that? If you find this language crass or distasteful or completely sophomoric, let me just make three quick points...

Point#3: Don't think asians and latinos don't do this to us routinely. Whenever we're not around, trust me, they constantly slander us behind our backs.

Point#2: What these people are receiving is a good ole karmic ass-kicking cause they don't understand that there's a price to pay for loving whitey unconditionally. Especially when white folks, historically, have done your people wrong. And nothing stops karma—nothing.

Point#1: And point number one is this: you should take the language I use here as a “litmus” test in regards to your sensibilities. And what do I mean by that? Simple—if you disagree with what I'm saying and how I'm saying it, chances are you're some kind of anglophile who shouldn't be here in the first place.

I'm not here to make friends, I'm here to tell the hard truth about the nature of white fascism and those who've been brainwashed by it. And if you're one of those “Pro-Black” brothas who thinks I'm still being unfair towards latinos and asians, I say you're the most brainwashed of us all. That to me smacks of “multiculturalism”, i.e. someone who really wants to curry the favor of whites. And I started this blog with the intention of obliterating that sentiment in myself and anyone who's reading this, and that's how I'll run it 'til its end.

Later...

MontUHURU Mimia

P.S. 

Here's the post I mentioned that details the disparities surrounding bank loans for Black people, and how we're treated differently from everyone else.

The gospel of white fascism (Part 25)...Prince Harry, Meghan Markel, Cinderella theories, consensus thinking and the virtues of living vicariously...

If there's no enemy within, the enemy outside can do us no harm.

--Ancient African proverb 

A couple of years ago, I was walking back to work from a break, when I spotted a mature brotha busily picking something out of the gutter. Now, the item he pinched up off a sewer grate looked like some sort of small towel, but it was actually a sports banner from his favorite team.

So after this man pulled said banner up from below the curb, I saw that he noticed a steel rod in front of the bus cubicle he stood at. This man then proceeded to wipe the dirt off this banner, before he smoothed it out on top of this 3 or 4 ft. rod. So what he essentially did was put his favorite sports team, almost literally, on a pedestal. After that I thought, if fascists can inspire that kind of loyalty for a sports team, then what could they do with a religion?

Several years before the aforementioned incident, my “ex” had taken a trip to Las Vegas with her mother and aunt. On this trip, she ran into a fellow she shared one of her classes with, and had a crush on. This happened to be a white guy who went to Vegas to marry his “bi-ethnic” bride.

Mind you, at this point in our relationship, me and my ex pretty much knew we wanted different things from a mate. In her case, consciously, she wanted to be with and was still physically attracted to Black men. Subconsciously, this Black woman was a complete anglophile, who was just getting some closer proximity to the white men she lusted after, via her university.

While vacationing, my ex called me raving about how lovely it was that this guy had married this woman in Vegas—then she said we should get married. Now, even though this was something resembling a proposal, I said we should wait 'til she gets back from the vacation, to see if she'd feel the same way when she came home. Neither one of us ever mentioned the subject again, and we broke up shortly thereafter. *Note: If you read my post: “Why Kerry Washington and Dave Moscow broke up, and the plight of Black college grads”, the Black woman I call “Brenda”, was not only a good friend of my ex, but my ex looked up to Brenda as a role-model. Oddly enough, my ex is also the one that told me the story about how Brenda got done-over by the whiteboi in that post.

Sandy Banks, a Black woman who was a journalist for the “Los Angeles Times”, wrote an article on May 29^th, 2010 titled: “Soul-searching on the subject of romance”. Now, this article was dedicated to explaining the reasons why “upper-scale” Black women, couldn't find Black men to marry. And basically the conclusion Sandy drew was, there just aren't enough “quality” Black men to satisfy the multitudes of corporate Black woman in the workplace—so their only option was to date white and non-Black men. And she asked the readers of her article, to give her their opinions.

Fast forward to June 1^st, 2010. Sandy got several responses to her article, but none of them were what she'd thought they'd be. Case in point, here's one of the comments left by a “white, middle-aged man in Woodland Hills (California)” who called himself, Alan: “Any male, Black or not, would be intimidated by the raucous foul-mouthed 'braying' of so many Black women. They are often offensive in the extreme, obese or have a tendency to be so, and challenge the masculinity of any male.” And Sandy pointed out that the majority of comments to her article, reflected the same sentiment(s). And I'll leave a link to that particular article at the end of this post.

Now, on Monday the 27^th, of this year, Prince Harry announced his engagement to one Meghan Markle. And coincidentally, just like the Sandy Banks article was published for the L.A. Times, Meghan herself, was born in Los Angeles, CA.

She's an actress who's claim to fame is portraying a character named Rachel Zane, on the USA network's legal drama, “Suits”. She had that gig for seven seasons, and she's had various other TV acting roles on shows like, “CSI” and “Fringe”. Mind you, what also makes her engagement to Prince Harry unusual, is the fact that she's “bi-ethnic”, meaning, her mom's Black and her father's white.

Now, I'd been hearing that Black women have swooned over this marriage, looking at it as a win for them. But then I thought, nah—those are just rumors. But being a curious type of fellow, I did some research on the topic, and when I read into some “Essence” magazine articles on this wedding, here's some of the comments I found sista's “tweeting”:

“We got us a Black princess ya'll. You really can't tell me a damn thing for the rest of the day because it won't matter. Shout out to Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. Their wedding will be my Super Bowl.” 

“Black women, what y'all wearing to the royal wedding? It's a spring wedding. Got mines:” 

“Meghan does pass and there are conversations we can have about that, but the reality is she is biological a Black woman who was raised by a Black woman. No one can take that away from her. So Imma celebrate.” 

“Prince Harry's future mother-in-law is a black woman with dreadlocks. There are no words for this kind of joy.”

Now, these comments reminded me of three things: One, it had me recalling the vicarious living and concensus thinking mind-states involved in that brotha who fished his sport's teams banner outta' the gutter, cause he felt such a bond with them. And reminded me how people who aren't on these teams, often say “we're” going to the playoffs, whenever these teams play in championship games.

Two: this reminds me of the time when someone told me that on one episode of the TV series, “Scandal”, that Olivia Pope and Fritz, had sex in a closet. I said, “No way.” But once I did some research, sure enough, they had this scene on “YouTube”. And to add to this nonsense, After good ole Fritz was done with Olivia in their “closet tryst”, he told her, he'd made a mistake and it shouldn't of happened.

And three: this reminded me of the “Scandal parties” held by Black women, when this show would air.

Mind you, the comments of Olivia Dope, I mean, Pope, and Fritz having sex in a closet, were eerily similar to the tweeted comments about Prince Harry's wedding.

Now, inevitably, there's gonna' be some sistas reading this who say, aw—Black men are just mad at us being with white guys.

And for the record, I'm not mad—I'm puzzled.

And I can safely say that myself and multitudes of other brothas have the same question on this topic, and thats: why would Black women make themselves look this desperate to be with white men?

Mind you, if you're a “swirlin'” sista, and you're with the white man of your dreams, I say: good for you—go be happy. But for the life of me, I don't understand why sistas can't see that the Prince Harry marriage ain't a win for Black women.

Now, when Serena Williams married Alexis Ohanian, I could see how Black women would look upon that as a coup/win for Black women, cause Serena's a “pure-bred” sista. And I hope they're happy together—but once I heard about Black women doting on Meghan Markle, when I saw her, my first response was: “She's Black?”

Also, I know for a fact, if Meghan was dating a Black man, every Black woman seeing them, would think Meg's white.

Now, on the Tuesday before last, I wrote a post on the singer Jill Scott and the actress Halle Berry, detailing how consciously they're thinking they wanna' be with “good” Black men, while subconsciously, they're conditioned to hate us. And Black women's response to the Prince Harry wedding, just reinforces this truth.

Moreover, sometimes I wonder whether Black women care about their reputations or not. Cause collectively, you should know, that for women (or men) showing these levels of desperation is counterproductive to fostering long-lasting relationships. And once again, I'm not talking about how many whtie and non-Black men a Black woman's had sex with, I'm talking about getting into and being in long-term relationships and marriages with men.

And that's another reason why I'm glad “Alan”, the middle-aged man who wrote the comment on the L.A. Times, Sandy Banks article, was white. Cause if a Black man had written that comment, the overwhelming majority of Black women would quickly ignore it.

So I've said all that to say this: Black women, your behaviors towards Black men are not only getting harder and harder for me to defend, but the majority of you are giving marriage-minded Black men no other choice but to date and marry any other kind of woman, but you.

Now, like I told a smart, young brotha named “Kevin” recently, I'm not only a Black Nationalist, but I'm a “realist”—and realistically, a marriage-minded Black man doesn't have the time or desire to put up with the condescending, combative and altogether abrasive attitudes exhibited by more than half of Black women, towards us.

Additionally, brotha “Kevin” put the aforementioned sentiment this way: “in regards to 'Black' women (most), I'd argue that THERE IS NO RECONCILIATION WITHOUT ATONEMENT; until they (Black women) can confess to and suffer the consequences of screwing ('Kev' used a different word) us over, there's no use in talking about 'Black Love/Black Unity'.”

So if you're a “swirlin'” sista who winds up oversexed and alone at fifty behind being the sex toy of so many white and non-Black men, just do me a favor, and don't blame this on not being able to find a “good” Black man. Cause truth be told, just like sistas are displaying with their fervor over the Prince Harry wedding—you never wanted to be with one of us in the first place.

Later...

MontUHURU Mimia

P.S.

If you wanna' read the Sandy Banks, "L.A. Times" article, you can do that here. 

P.P.S.

Here's an alternate “header” I created for this post. And what struck me as odd, is how Prince Harry's hands look “bound” by “hand-cuffs” (you can click on the pic, to enlarge it. And you can click on any pic on my posts to enlarge them). This to me is no coincidence, cause the reason Harry is really marrying Meghan, is cause white elite's have tasked him with pushing inter-ethnic marriages between white men and “non-white” (and especially “Black”) women, so the offspring of the Black woman, will have a lessened genetic power to breed whites out of existence. It's also no coincidence that Prince Harry is getting married at the age of 33. And you can check out my post titled: "Why I no longer listen to Tommy Sotomayor", to see the significance of that number in white fascist freemasonry. The campaign of white fascists is all about getting rid of the “pure-bred” Black person y'all—period.

And here's a vid that went viral of a woman who goes by the name of “the QueenAplus”, when her name is really, “TaQuita”, crying over not being able to find a “Black man” to dance with. Mind you, this Black woman had a child with a white man. But notice how she doesn't call out white men, only Black ones, like we're obligated to be with her, regardless of how she acts around us. And to the sistas watching: understand, when it comes to Black men and copying behaviors like TaQuita's, trust that more and more of you will wind up like this.