The end of feminism (Part 4)...College exam scams, Lori Loughlin, the fallacious meritocracy of america's universities, white affirmative action, and the (continuing) ethnic escapades of Rachel Dolezal...

To the (consistent) readers of this blog: Whenever I write a post in this series, I feel obligated to preface the subject matter with the reason why white fascist feminism, has nothing to do with female empowerment—especially in regards to the (indigenous) Black woman. And when I use the term “indigenous” that’s not hyperbole. Meaning, if you’re a Black woman reading this from anywhere in the world, understand, you (and we) were on this earth before anyone else. Thus, we should understand why we have the most genetic power(s) to breed every other ethnic group out of existence if we so choose—and this is especially true of white folks.

So, I feel it’s imperative that I reiterate what feminism is, and what it ain’t—moreover, let me tell the tale of how this fascist feat of social engineering got started…

Years ago, I watched a PBS program, where a man who looked like the spitting image of George Soros, the billionaire Hedge Fund manager, waxed philosophic about an upper-scale soiree he attended, where he got into a conversation with a Rockefeller. He said this man asked him what he thought about “Women’s Lib” (for those of you under 30, this was the “Women’s Liberation movement” that preceded modern day feminism), to which the George Soros looking fellow said, “Well, I think it’s positive, you know, equal pay for equal work”. The Rockefeller replied, “We funded Women’s Lib—and the reason we did was, we couldn’t tax half the population if they were staying at home and being housewives—we had to get women into the work force to get at that revenue…” A sec’ later, the Rockefeller continued, “…and with both parents out of the household, we essentially knew that the TV would be the authoritative figure raising (america’s) children—thus, consecutive generations would be easier to program and control.”

And I’ll confess, after hearing that, my mind was forever changed. Not only cause the Rockefeller’s soliloquy made absolute sense to me, but it introduced me to a level of insidious ingenuity and esoteric info. that put me on a path of seeking out factoids that were parallel, or at least congruent with these trains of thought.

So, it’s with this sentiment in mind that I wanna’ explore and expound on the ways that 2 particular white women, Lori Loughlin and Rachel Dolezal, fit into the social engineering campaigns of white fascist feminism, in regards to their place in it, and how it benefits them (whether they realize it or not).

With that said, let’s delve into the nucleus of what makes these college exam scams a matter of course when it comes to the tenets of white fascism and white fascist feminism.

—MontUHURU Mimia

Lori Anne Loughlin (right), the american-born actress, model and producer, was born on July 28^th, 1964 to parents Lorelee and Joseph Roy Loughlin, in Queens, New York City. And while in elementary school, Lori’s parents noticed her interests in acting had blossomed into a full-blown passion—thus, Lori began to pursue this career with her parents help, when she became a print model at the tender age of 11.

At 15, Lori was cast in the soap opera, “The Edge of Night”, playing the part of Jodi Travis, an aspiring dancer. That gig lasted from 1980 to 1983, before Lori began to pick up bit parts in an assortment of feature films and TV guest spots. Then, in 1988, Lori stumbled upon what would become her career-defining role, as Rebecca Donaldson, on the ABC sit-com, “Full House”. Initially set for six episodes, Lori would remain a staple of the show throughout the rest of the series until 1995. Months after the show ended, Lori starred alongside TV actor, Tony Danza, in another ABC sit-com, Hudson Street—unfortunately, the show was met with poor reviews and ratings, and was cancelled in a year.

In the following years, Lori would go on to guest and co-star in several TV shows, like: Suddenly Susan, Spin City, Seinfeld, The Drew Carey Show, etc. From 2004 to 2005, she co-created, produced, and starred in the “WB” drama series, “Summerland”—and she’d continue to appear in feature films like, “Moondance Alexander” (2007), and the made-for-TV-movie, “Meet My Mom”, which premiered on the Hallmark Channel on Mother’s Day in 2010.

Rachel Anne Dolezal (left), a.k.a. Nkechi Amare Diallo (please!), was born on November 12^th, 1977 to parents Ruthanne and Lawrence “Larry” Dolezal, in Lincoln County, Montana. Now, Rachel was homeschooled via the “Christian Liberty Academy” or “CLASS” program, where she achieved a 4.0 GPA, and not only was she a co-valedictorian at her high school graduation, but she won a $2,000 collegiate scholarship awarded by “Tandy Leather” for her entry in their 1996 Leather Art contest. Thereafter, Rachel attended Belhaven University in Jackson, Mississippi, where she received a bachelor’s degree in 2000, and after that, she applied and was accepted to, Howard University (yes, the “historically” Black college) for her graduate studies. There, she received her Masters of Fine Arts degree.

Now, behind Rachel’s “Civil Rights” themed artwork, which included sculptures and paintings that held to narratives of Black people’s struggles against america’s white fascism, she was elected as head of the Spokane, Washington chapter of the NAACP. Her announced resignation from the position came on June 15, 2015 behind friends, family members and numerous media reports exposing her as being “non-Black”.  

Dolezal also applied for and was given the position of Spokane, Washington’s Chair of the Office of Police Ombudsman Commission in May of 2014. Now, on Rachel’s application, she claimed to have come from a wide variety of ethnic backgrounds, including “African-american”—and at the beginning of 2015, City Council President Ben Stuckart opened an investigation into the truthfulness of her ethnicity. Shortly thereafter, on June 17^th, 2015, it was found that Rachel not only lied about her ethnic makeup, but she’d violated governmental rules and “abused” her authority in this position, which prompted both the mayor and the Spokane City Council to fire Rachel from being the chair of the Police Ombudsman Commission.

Now, let’s stop here.

Seemingly, Lori and Rachel—or Nkechi (again, please!), have nothing in common—other than their ethnic backgrounds. But these white women are actually so similar, they could be carbon copies of each other.

Now, the readers of this post may be thinkin’—bruh, I don’t see the connection—you’re gonna’ have to prove this one to me.

Bet.

Let me show you not only one example of why these two are so stereotypically white—but 3 examples that’ll bring this point home…

#1. Both Lori and Rachel, not only relish their white (fascist) privileges, but they’re staunch practitioners of it.

Now, Lori was recently arrested for paying some $500,000 in bribes to have her 2 daughters admitted into the University of Southern California’s “crew team”. Mind you, not only have neither of Lori’s daughters ever competed in “crew teams”, but 50 other (white) people are facing federal charges for paying out similar bribes. This kinda’ reminds me of when you’d hear about the unjust practice of Black students, Black male student athletes especially, paying to have people do their homework (and take exams) for them so they’d get into college—welp, seems like whitey’s the one who’s really been doin’ this all along—difference is, if Tyrone was given an athletic scholarship, he’d have to prove his prowess on the field or court (and mind you, when we do this, it’s called “affirmative action”). Also, in the case of Lori’s daughters, the only evidence they have of participating in any kind of “crew team” sports, was a picture of them (by themselves) sitting on a rowing machine.

Now, I can already hear folks who’re reading this thinkin’, well that may apply to Lori, but Rachel was tryna’ be Black, bruh—so how does your argument apply to her?

Here’s how…

While Rachel was at Howard U., she passed herself off as a Black woman. But after she was accepted, she turned back around to “re-claim” her “whiteness” (calling herself Rachel “Moore”), and made it a point to say she’d been denied access to certain scholarship funds, an assistant teacher’s position, and other opportunities at Howard ‘cause—wait for it—she was white. So, like every other white feminist, she wants the ability to have her cake and eat it too—meaning, she wants to enjoy her white privileges, while trying to pass herself off as an “oppressed minority”. Now, you may be sayin’, yeah bruh, I get that, but that still don’t make her a staunch advocate or practitioner of white fascism.  

Welp, let me break this point down even further…

See, the reason Rachel endeavored to go to Howard U. and apply for a position with the NAACP, is because she’d been told her whole life, by her white parents, that Black people were getting all these unfair advantages, just ‘cause they were Black. Namely, her parents raised her to believe that Black people would (automatically) get more financial aid than white people, and that our lazy, shiftless butts were collecting more welfare than anyone else. That’s why she’s done whatever she could to pass herself off as a sista—it has nothing to do with loving us or our culture. Mind you, the majority of people on welfare in this country are white, and it’s been that way for decades—and I’ll leave a link to a website that proves this.

And in even more laymen’s terms: white fascism’s stereotypes of Black people turned Rachel into a straight-up ethnic HUSTLA’ y’all!

#2. Both Lori and Rachel are such advocates of white fascism and white fascist feminism, that they’re willing to suffer the consequences of their allegiances to it.

Meaning, Lori was so hell-bent on benefitting from her white fascist privileges that she was willing to do something illegal and risk going to jail for her beliefs. And wit’ Rachel, her devotions are even more extreme—cause recently she was brought up on charges of welfare fraud. It seems that good ol’ “Nkechi” didn’t report the $83,924 she deposited in her bank account, when she said she’d made less than $500 a year to apply for welfare. Mind you, Rachel collected $8,747 in food stamps and $100 for child care expenses from 2015 ‘til 2017.

#3. white fascism let Lori and Rachel off tha’ hook—just like they knew it would.

Now, Lori’s already been released from jail and her bail was set at $1 million dollars. Mind you, not only is Lori outta’ jail, but she’s free to continue working. And that even includes traveling to British Columbia for roles. The only caveat of that is, she’ll have to surrender her passport in December. Rachel was also set free shortly after she was booked—mind you, she was charged with first degree theft by welfare fraud and second-degree perjury. She pleaded not guilty to both these charges. Now, do you think any sista who’d committed these crimes would have walked out of jail like Nkechi, I mean, Rachel did?

So, I’ve said all that to say this: the people who love white male patriarchies more than white men, ARE WHITE WOMEN!

BLACK FEMINIST/WOMANYISTS, PLEASE TAKE NOTICE!!

I understand that collegiate Black women may befriend white girls who seem very sincere to their feminists ideologies, but once they graduate, they’ll be looking for a white guy to insert them into the comfy confines of white privilege.

AND DON’T TAKE MY WORD FOR IT—JUST ASK THE OVERWHELMING MAJORITY OF PEOPLE WHO VOTED FOR DONALD TRUMP—AND IT’S NO COINCIDENCE, THAT THEY JUST HAPPEN TO BE WHITE WOMEN!

And like Sam L. Jackson said in Spike Lee’s classic movie, “Do the Right Thing”: “That’s the double truth, Ruth.”

Later…

—MontUHURU Mimia

P.S.

Here’s a vid clip showing how hard Rachel’s working to convince herself and everyone else that she’s a sista—which goes to prove that if you repeat a lie long enough, it’ll become a truth—at least to you. *Note: check out what happens when a journalist asks Rachel to confirm if her parents are Black.

P.P.S.

If you wanna’ check out the website that shows how the majority of the people on welfare in america are white, you can do that HERE.

 P.P.S.

And for y’all who’re wondering—here’s where I got this saying from…

The Gospel of white fascism (Part 40)...Donald Trump, gov't shutdown(s), falling incarceration rates, the criminality of Black economics, and the acculturation of drawing order outta' chaos...

“It’s been a long time, I shouldn’t have left you without a strong rhyme to step to, think about all the weak shows you slept through—time’s up, I’m sorry I kept you.”

—Rakim, from the song, “You know you got soul”

“The rift between Black men and women is irreparable, and the campaign to save the Black family is officially dead.”

—a comment made on my Blog, by a “Pro-Black” sista, named Monique, in 2014

“…THERE IS NO RECONCILIATION WITHOUT ATONEMENT; until they (Black women) can confess to and suffer the consequences of screwing us (Black men) over, there’s no use in talking about ‘Black Love/Black Unity’.”

—a comment made on my Blog, by a (brilliant) young brotha, who’s a “Black Men’s Rights Activist”, named “Kev” in 2017.

To the readers of this Blog: Beyond apologizing for letting life “thangs” get in the way of my obligation(s) to post weekly editorials here, I must confess, that sometimes, I feel like a fool for betting on (as corny as it sounds) “Black Love”. And mind you, the above comments (with the exception of the song lyric), are only the tip of the iceberg, when it comes to the glacier-sized insidiousness of our people’s self-hatred. But trust me when I say, that even though I consider these comments to be completely erroneous, I definitely see where this brotha and sista are coming from.

And with that said, here’s why I can’t subscribe to their points of view…

Now, this is the part when you’re probably thinkin’, okay, he’s about ta’ wax philosophic on looking at Black dysfunction(s) in the context of the white fascism that created them—or, he’s gonna’ preach a sermon ‘bout the importance of home-schooling our children…

Actually…no.

At least, not right now. *smiles*

But I will admit, that the reason I’m ultimately bettin’ on US is, I’m a bit biased. And let me expound on what I’m talkin’ about, ‘cause I’d be doing the family a disservice If I didn’t say this about myself. I grew up with Black parents who stayed married for 40 years. Mind you, their marriage wasn’t a blissful love affair throughout—actually, it was quite rocky at times, nevertheless, the “Black Love” (again, for lack of a better term) paradigm, is one I saw modeled in front of me, for the greater part of my life. So, when it comes to the prospects of Black men and women being together, I know it’s possible—mind you, not entirely probable, but possible. I do understand that the majority of modern-day Black men and women, want nothing to do (romantically) with other Black men and women. So, if you’re an indigenous Black person reading this, who genuinely wants to be in a relationship with one of your own kind (mind you, not in the context of being with the same sex) then you must understand, it truly will be a needle-in-the-haystack search. 

I also understand that the overwhelming majority of people who read and/or comment on this blog, are coming from a household that looked nothing like the one I grew up in. Mind you, I’m not saying that to gloat or boast about my homelife, but I will say, because of my upbringing, that my thinking (especially about US) is different.

Meaning, because I saw a Black man and woman together for most of my life, it doesn’t seem like such an idealistic pipedream for me. Conversely, I still do understand that there’s an element of idealism I’ve gotta’ maintain, if I endeavor to date and possibly marry a woman who looks like me.

Now, I also wanna’ comment on one fundamental part of the whole Black self-hating experience/experiment—and it’s the one I find the most distressing—it’s when any brotha or sista has the audacity to say…

I don’t know what it is about Black people, that makes us unable to work together like everyone else.

And let me just say, if you subscribe to this point of view, then you are wHITEY’S “PERFECT VICTIM”.

Why, you ask?

Here’s the answer...

If you as a Black person, don’t realize, on some level, that we have been worked on more than any other kind of person to hate ourselves and everyone who looks like us, cause we have the most genetic power(s) to breed whitey out of existence, than you (as a Black man or woman) have been SLEEP-WALKING YOUR WHOLE DAMN LIFE!

Meaning, when a Black man or woman utters this sentiment, and doesn’t understand why we’re seemingly more dysfunctional than other folks, I just shake my head—cause I’m thinkin’, which country have you been livin’ in for the past few decades?

To me, these people are like abused children, who don’t realize they’ve been abused. Or better yet, they’re like MK-ULTRA (mind-control) victims who’ve been programmed with psychic “alters” around their trauma, so they can consciously forget what’s been done to them.

Like I’ve said in the past, NONE OF OUR DYSFUNCTIONS ARE NATURAL TO US!! NONE OF ‘EM!! THEY’VE ALL BEEN CONDITIONED INTO US BY THE wHITE FASCIST SOCIAL ORDER(S) WE LIVE IN!

MEANING: NO OTHER GROUP OF PEOPLE ARE TAUGHT THAT THEY’RE THE DUMBEST, UGLIEST, AND POOREST PEOPLE IN THE WORLD, BUT US!

AND IF YOU DON’T KNOW THIS, YOU’RE DOOMED TO HATE YOURSELF AND EVERYONE WHO LOOKS LIKE YOU FOR THE REST OF YOUR LIFE!

Now, is this an excuse for us to stay in our dysfunctions?

HELL NO!

But the first step in resolving any problem, is knowing that you indeed have one—and KNOWING ITS CAUSE!

Mind you, I was speaking to a brotha on this very same topic, and he told me that he knows what whitey did to us—before telling me, straight out: “I don’t care about the cause!”

So, what he (and other Black folks like him) are doing, is giving whitey a pass for all the dastardly things he’s done to our people. Needless to say, I’m not around that guy anymore.

And it’s with this (sentiment) in mind, that I’m writing about what really inspired Don Trump (and his white fascist handlers) to shut the american government down. Also, I recently came across an interesting factoid that I must share with the family: american census bureau data from the years of 1994 til’ 2006, shows that incomes of Black americans, surpassed those of white americans in Jamaica, Queens, NYC.

And this is the community I grew up in.

Additionally, being from Jamaica, Queens, I remember going to school with Damon John who created the “FUBU” fashion line. And I recall actually seeing LL Cool J, Run, from “RUN-DMC”, and being old enough to realize that Ja Rule lived 20 minutes from my house—and so did Irv Gotti, the music executive behind “Murder Inc.” records. And mind you, I’ll leave a link for the New York Times article(s) that’ll corroborate my community’s economic status.

Moreover, I remember attending high school in Jamaica, Queens, and how I was taught by a white teacher, that asains (especially fair-skinned asians) were harder working (and smarter) than my people would ever be. Mind you, I recently came across another article proving that asians are the poorest ethnic group in NYC (and I’ll leave a link for that too). And these kinds of economics are the central issues I’ll be tackling in this post. And might I add, looking back on this info. infuriates me, ‘cause if facts like these were readily available to me and my friends (like crime was on the local news), so many lives in Jamaica, Queens could’ve been saved behind us feeling empowered by our community’s financial state(s) of grace.

With that said, I’m askin’ (one mo’ time), for your kind indulgences, behind this post running a bit longer than usual and behind this topic being a bit dated. And as always, I’m writing wit’ y’all in mind, so I’ll do everything I can to make this a comfortably fluid read. And once again, I encourage your feedback, as this space was created to not only give a voice to our problems, but to offer solutions to them.

And lastly, for the intrepid amongst you who made it a point to visit my Blog while I was away, I say (again), thank you, thank you, and THANK YOU!

—MontUHURU Mimia

Gordon Parks, the quintessential portrait of an indigenous Black renaissance man (meaning, he was a writer, photographer, musician, and film director) wrote and directed his film, “The Learning Tree”, in 1969. Now, this movie was based on Gordon’s novel of the same name, and it’s basically a retelling of the travails Gordon himself suffered, growing up as a young Black man in a small Kansas town in the pre-Depression era of the 1920’s. Mind you, having seen this movie, a couple of times, I can say that it’s a quaint dramatization of living under the tyrannies of white fascism, but Gordon was smart enough to realize that something was amiss with this flick.

And he came to this conclusion after the Melvin Van Peebles movie, “Sweet Sweetback’s Badass Song” hit theaters in 1971. Gordon saw that Sweetback (played by Melvin himself), was a brotha who dared to beat up corrupt white cops and think he could get away with it—and did at the movie’s end. Gordon also saw how Sweetback got mad love from brothas and sistas on the street, ‘cause he was a man who refused to shuffle and buck-dance for whitey. Gordon also dug how Sweetback’s movie persona gave us some pride. And as Melvin himself said, “I wanted my people to leave that movie with their heads up.”

Thus, taking a cue from Melvin, Gordon came out with the film “Shaft” in 1971. Now, the movie Shaft took a 180 degree turn from “The Learning Tree’s” (TLT) narrative, insomuch as John Shaft was not only a one-man army who took on white mobsters, but he defeated them at the end of the flick. And again, this was in stark contrast to the Black townspeople of TLT, who seemed altogether deflated and defeated. Now, Melvin’s “Sweetback” and Gordon’s “Shaft”, are the 2 movies that kicked-off what was known as the “Blaxploitation film” era of the 1970’s. And some of those flicks had names like “Hitman” (1972), “Black Caesar” (1973), “The Spook Who Sat by the Door” (1973), “Three the Hard Way” (1974), ”BuckTown” (1975), etc. And the common theme running through all these films were Black men beating the hell outta’ white cops, or any other kind of white male authority figure. Additionally, these films saved the failing american movie studios in the early 70’s.

Now, these films weren’t only a source of entertainment, but they gave a lot of Black people, and Black men especially, boatloads of inspiration to stop being abused by white bosses and get better jobs, or to start creating their own independent businesses, period. Now, even though whitey was caking off behind our patronage of these kinds of movies, he was thinking, wait a sec’—if these people see too much of these flicks, they might stop fantasizing about retaliating against white cops, and start taking up arms against us. That’s when white fascist freemasons like Jesse Jackson, coined the phrase “Blaxploitation”, and gave it to these movies for the expressed purpose of getting rid of them. Which they eventually did.

Mind you, those films were but one factor that contributed to the median household income of Black americans nearly doubling in the 1970’s. The fact that more of us were obtaining college degrees also gave our collective salaries a boost. And there’s tangible research to back this up by organizations like the “Economic Policy Institute”, who crunched the data and showed that during the years of 1968 until 1979, the “inflation-adjusted” annual income of Black americans increased by 42.8%, and mind you, that slightly outpaced typical income growth for white households during that same period, since their increases only totaled 36.7%. To top all this off, the song “Ain’t No Stoppin’ Us Now”, by the singing duo, McFadden and Whitehead, encapsulated the aspirational zeitgeist and upward mobility of Black americans of that era.

And, as a matter of course, this scarred whitey’s fascist sensibilities. Thus, in the Reagan 80’s, we got the lethal troika of “Reaganomics”, Crack and AIDS, to eradicate any progress our communities had made.

Fast forward to 2018—Now, instead of Reagan, we got good ol’ Don Trump shutting down the american gov’t behind Dixiecrats, I mean Democrats, and Republicans being unable to resolve an ongoing standoff regarding Trump wanting $5 billion dollars to build a border wall to keep undocumented latinos out. Hey, serves Julio and ‘em right for thinking they’re “whiter” than us.  

Now, no diss to the twenty-somethings out there, but it’s times like this when I think, man, I’m glad I’m older. Reason being, is wisdom affords middle-aged folks like myself, an even-temperedness and conflict-resolving temperament that only comes with age. Meaning, I recognized this “border wall” dispute for the white fascist maneuvering against Black folks that it really was. So, I instinctively knew that if whitey’s engaging in these kinds of destabilizing methods, 3 things must be happening—and those are:

#1. Crime rates must be down.

#2. The collective income of Black americans must be up.

#3. And lastly, more Black americans must be going to college.

But ultimately, this was just a collective hunch, until I could back it up wit’ some research—so, here’s 3 mo’ facts I found when I did just that…

#1. In the case of overall crime rates in america, according to FBI stats, violent crimes have fallen 49% between 1993 and 2017—and according to the “Bureau of Justice Statistics” (BJS), violent crimes fell 67% during these years. Additionally, FBI stats say “property crimes” have fallen by 50%, and BJS stats say these crimes have fallen by as much as 69% during the same time. Mind you, property crimes include burglary, theft, and motor vehicle theft—and they’re far more common than violent crimes.

Now, scores of statisticians have waxed philosophic about what brought this dip in crime about. And some common, working-class folk are reluctant to believe these stats saying, “Crime ain’t down in my neighborhood.” But regardless of what anyone believes, the bottom line is this: less crimes, means less arrests, which might mean less incarcerated Black men—and that’s surely a problem for white folks and fascists everywhere. However, I’ve come up with my own theory, and it goes a little something like this: 2 things are contributing to (Black) crime rates falling so precipitously, and those are…

A. More than anything else, the explosion of white drug use in america (a.k.a. the “opioid epidemic”) has swelled america’s prisons with more white inmates at alarming levels. Understand, the same drug laws that put Black men behind bars for multiple years, are now being used to sentence their own kind—so whitey’s being forced to concentrate more on whitebois in a system set up for Black men—but instead of pointing this out, they’d rather cover it up by saying crimes, where we usually find them (in Black neighborhoods), are down. And truth be told, the majority of drug use in Black neighborhoods involve us selling narcotics to the whitebois coming to our ‘hood to get ‘em—even though stats bear out, whitey’s the ones doing the majority of the drug selling too.

B. Under the Barack Obama presidency, unemployment rates dropped by 4.8% overall, and the economy gained 11.6 million jobs—and this is the same low unemployment rate that good ol’ Don Trump is saying he’s responsible for.

So, bottom line is, Black americans are using less drugs (especially compared to whites), and more of us are working—which means, at least half of us are NOT out committing crimes.

#2. In the case of median incomes for Black americans, the “Brookings Institute” conducted a study showing that the household incomes of 125 communities in “majority-Black” cities actually “outpaced” the national average for ALL american ETHNIC GROUPS. Mind you, the national average for american household incomes (annually) is $53, 889—and this data comes by way of the “American Community Survey” of 2015. And according to the survey, the Black communities that are doing exceptionally well seem to be concentrated in the state of Maryland—meaning, the largest of these thriving neighborhoods is in Waldorf, MD. (earning a median income of $81,592) with a population of 71,399 residents, and Highland Beach, MD. with a smaller population of 110 residents, earning the highest median income for Black americans overall, at $158,750 annually.

Now, once again, I must confess, THIS IS WHY I LOVE BEING A BLACK NATIONALIST! Cause if I was just an anglophilic kiss-ass of a Black man, I’d be conditioned into thinking that our people are the poorest, dumbest, and ugliest people in the world—and that’s wHITEY’S PLAN FOR US Y’ALL!!

So, if you encounter a brainwashed brotha or sista who’s calling us folk in the “Black Conscious Community”, a bunch of stupefied “pro-Black” “Hotep-pers”, just give ‘em a facepalm and keep it pushin’. Let ‘em stay stuck in the morass of deifying white folk—'cause truth be told, they’re happier feeling inferior to those pale-skinned dead-enders.

Moving on…

#3. The American Council on Education crunched numbers to show that there’s not only more Black men in college than in prison, but it shows how this has been a fact since the year 2000 (at least). And I’ll leave a link for their website too. Moreover, since 2008, incarceration rates for Black men have been DECREASING. And that means what? It means, more Black men are not only out of jail, but (according to these stats) more of us are educated and gainfully employed than in previous years—and whitey don’t like that.

Now, I’m gonna’ sound like a broken record here, but the reason good ole Don shut this gov’t down is not only for the 3 reasons above—it’s because WE HAVE THE MOST GENETIC POWER TO BREED THESE INBREDS OUTTA’ EXISTENCE! AND AS WE SPEAK WHITEY’S COMMITTING SUICIDE LIKE CRAZY, OVERDOSING ON DRUGS IN DROVES, AND THEIR BIRTHRATES HAVE FALLEN BELOW REPLACEMENT LEVELS OVER THE COURSE OF THE LAST FEW DECADES!

And to put it in more layman’s terms: THEY FINISHED Y’ALL!! IT’S A WRAP FO’ ‘EM!!

Now, does this mean whitey’s got no more power?

HELL NO!

But it does mean that they see the end is near—AND THEY CAN’T STOP IT! NO MATTER WHAT THEY DO!

So, the indigenous Black people of the world should feel empowered and emboldened to “UNIFY” NOW, MORE THAN EVER! Cause whitey also sees that their fall means OUR RISE! And they also realize that whatever they do to us, WILL ALSO AFFECT THEM!

MEANING, THE DEVIL’S TIME IS UP Y’ALL!!

AND IT’S ABOUT DAMN TIME!

WELCOME TO 2019 FAMILY!!

Later…

MontUHURU Mimia

P.S.

You can check out stats that show the incarceration rates of Black men are down HERE.

P.P.S.

You can check out stats showing that a large number of Black america’s communities have median incomes outpacing other ethnic groups HERE.

P.P.P.S.

You can read up on the exalted economic status of Black communities in Jamaica, Queens HERE.

Also, if you wanna’ see the news article showing that asians are the poorest ethnic group in NYC, you can check it out HERE.

Lastly, here’s the song, “Ain’t No Stoppin’ Us Now”, by McFadden and Whitehead. Now, this vid clip is one of an episode of “Soul Train”, where the singing duo performed this song. I just ask that you don't laugh too hard at the flamboyantly gay men dancin’ to this tune—ENJOY!

The white fascist attack on Black femininity (Part 3)...Netflix's "Nappily Ever After", #teamnatural, Instagram, Sanaa Lathan, and Sinead O'Connor's traumatic childhood...

Sinead Marie Bernadette O’Connor (left) was born on December 8^th, 1966 in Glenageary, Ireland, and was named after Sinead de Valera, wife of Irish President, Eamon de Valera. Sinead’s parents are Sean O’Connor, who was a structural engineer, later turned barrister, and Marie O’Connor.

A few years after Sinead was born, Sean separated from Marie, and they both agreed to leave the children in care of their mother. Now, Sinead in her later years, would go on to describe the horrific and torturous living conditions enforced by Marie. In fact, the abuse exacted on Sinead was so extreme, that at age 15, she left her mother’s home to live with her father. Unfortunately, the dysfunctional nature of Sean’s home combined with the damage that was done by Marie, resulted in Sinead turning to a life of school truancy and shoplifting, that resulted in her being committed to an institution called the “Magdalene Asylum”. And mind you, the Magdalene Asylum was notorious for its abuses towards their patients—and this is most notably documented in the movie “The Magdalene Sisters”.

Fortunately, this facility provided Sinead with a stable enough environment to pursue her musical endeavors. An example of this, was a female volunteer of the Magdalene Asylum hearing Sinead sing a cover of the Barbara Streisand song, “Evergreen”, who would later introduce Sinead to her brother, and this volunteer’s brother, just happened to be in a band called “Tua Nua”. Sinead recorded her first song with them, but ultimately, wasn't allowed to joint the group ‘cause she was just 15. Regardless, it was this experience that led her to put an ad in the “Hot Press” musicians’ magazine, which turned into a meeting with Colm Farrelly—and with him, Sinead created another group called, “Ton Ton McCoute”. Now, with this band, audiences got to see how talented a singer Sinead really was.

Sinead’s time with Ton Ton McCoute got her noticed by music industry executives. One of which, got her a deal with “Ensign Records”. There, she got a manager who had her sing the lead vocal for a song called “Heroine”, on the soundtrack of the film, “Captive”. This led to Sinead recording her first album, “The Lion and the Cobra”, which was called a “sensation” by the music press, after its release in 1987. The album reached gold status and earned her a “Best Female Rock Vocal Performance” Grammy nomination. Beyond that, the album’s single “Mandika”, was a hit on college radio stations in america (and this is when I first became aware of her), and another of her songs, “Troy”, became a hit in europe, where it reached no. 5 on the Dutch Top 40 music charts.  

Mind you, what made Sinead stand out, just as much as her talent, was her close cropped, shaved hairdo.

Now, let’s stop here a sec’, ‘cause I’m guessing people are saying to themselves, bruh—what the heck does this have to do wit’ any white fascist attack on Black femininity? And I’ll answer that in a minute, but before I do, let’s get into this…

On September of last year, Sanaa Lathan released an Instagram post, after shaving her head, for the lead role in the Netflix movie, “Nappily Ever After” (left). And in 2018, this movie came out—I guess—and I say that, cause I’ve neither seen this movie, nor do I plan to. And it’s not because I disagree wit’ the hairstyle, it’s ‘cause I see the white fascist agenda behind it.

Now, fast forward to January of this year, and the release of Marvel’s “Black Panther” movie. This film’s portrayal of the “Dora Milaje” (the female warriors guarding King T’Challa), wearing this hair style is being aggrandized to influence more Black women to accept and adopt it. And without further ado, let me tell you why, if you’re a Black woman reading this, you should think twice and three times before you make the “Big Chop”, as they say.

Now, the reason why Black women should give pause to wearing any kinda’ “crew-cut” of a hairdo, comes down to this: one of the physical features that makes women feel innately feminine, is long hair. And that’s true whether a woman realizes it or not. Meaning what? It means, the overwhelming majority of women, will find that cutting your hair off like this, can be traumatizing.

And let me break this down even further….

The first thing both men and women think, when they see a female with extremely short, closed cropped hair is, this woman is afflicted with some sort of physical or mental illness.

PERIOD.

And in the wake of the Black Panther movie, whitey’s workin’ overtime to sell this bogus narrative of empowerment through cuttin’ off all your hair, to Black women. Now, if you’re a Black woman reading this, you might be thinkin’, bruh, this is just your opinion—besides, I see plenty of white women rockin’ this hair style. Well, here’s the difference between you and them—the white woman has the white privilege. Meaning, she’s been given the stereotype of being the world’s prettiest female—and Black women don't have this kind of luxury.

Now, I want every Black woman reading this to understand what I’m NOT saying.

I am not saying that Black women aren’t as attractive as white women—and if you as a Black woman, can’t see how this white woman is trying to look more and more like you (lip and butt injections, hello…) then you’re just not paying attention. I’m saying that by european standards of beauty (i.e. whitey’s own measure of beauty), white women are supposed to be the world’s prettiest females.

Now, what whitey’s doing, is trying to co-opt the pride that Black women are feeling behind wearing their natural hair (ala Instagram pages like “#teamnatural”), to say, the act of cutting off all your hair, equates to some measure of female empowerment. But you should note which hairstyle’s whitey’s not endorsing. Meaning, you don’t see Netflix executives, or any white TV or film execs for that matter, saying that Black women should have their hair in “locks”, or a “long natural”, that brothas and sistas used to call “afros”. No, he wants you to cut all your hair off!

Why?

So sistas can look hypermasculine.

And the more hypermasculine sistas look, the more whitey can keep ‘em in 3 states of being—which are: 1. well-paid, 2. oversexed, and 3. alone. And to break this further down, whitey knows that if they can keep Black women in the stereotype(s) of being abrasive, combative, and argumentative, he can keep them consuming more than any other kind of person on the planet.

Now, you may be thinkin’, I don’t see the connection—how would a Black woman’s being kept in these 3 states, make her the world’s greatest consumer? Simple: if Black women are kept outside the confines of long-term relationships, they’ll compensate for that lack of love by spending on various items—shoes, cars, cloths, food, travel, etc.

Now, you might be a Black woman that’s still thinking, bruh, your argument is bogus—besides, there’s no way you can prove a point this nebulous.

So, you want some proof?

Bet. 

To the left is a picture I took with my camera phone, when I visited my old college recently (and if you wanna' see this pic more clearly, you can click on it). Now, right off the bat, let me apologize for this pic’s lack of clarity and the reflections of light coming off it as well—and let me also say, one of the reasons for this photo’s blurred appearance, is the fact that these pics are behind a glass encasing. With that said, these are ads for the “Phi Theta Kappa” sorority, and the “Phi Beta Alpha” fraternity. And this photo’s oozing wit’ symbolism—so let’s go in on it’s decoding...

Now, for starters, I want you to check out how they’ve depicted the sista in this photo. And what’s the first thing you notice about her—besides her bitter countenance? Exactly, it’s her “armed forces” uniform. So, question: behind this Black woman wearing what looks like a military uniform, what conclusions are you gonna’ draw about her?

Answer: you’re gonna’ think, and mind you, whitey did this by design, that she’s combative, abrasive, aggressive, and hyper-masculine—in other words, what’s being said here is…

Black women, especially in the case of them being with white men, shouldn’t be considered for long-term relationships or marriage, they should only be thought of as sexual conquests.

Now conversely, look at the white guy in this photo. Notice he’s portrayed as some kinda’ smiling construction worker—meaning, he’s a happy, “working-class” caucasian—the kind no sista with a college degree should bother dating. But to all the Black women reading this, ESPECIALLY THE “SWIRLERS”, understand that this ad is saying 3 specific things to you directly—and they are…

#1. If you join this sorority, you have a better chance of gettin’ wit’ a white man—that’s the bait being offered here sistas.

#2. But if you choose to be with a white man, you shouldn’t expect to do any better than a “working-class” white guy.

#3. Regardless of how educated you as a Black woman are, the overwhelming majority of white men in this fraternity (and elsewhere) still think of you as being abrasive, argumentative, oversexed, and hypermasculine.

So, I’ve said all that to say this: if you’re a Black woman, don’t let whitey trick you into giving yourself one of these trauma-inducing, ultra-short hair cuts. Now, if you’re a Black woman who’s just looking to get noticed, so she can get more attention from men—then do whatcha’ feel. But, if you’re looking for a commitment from a man, in any kind of real relationship, understand, the average man is not after a masculine looking woman. Moreover, coupled with the stereotype of the “Angry Black Woman Syndrome”, this hairstyle is more likely to keep men avoiding, rather than approaching you.

Now, am I saying I’d rather see a sista in a weave?

HELL NO!

I’m saying, Black women need to use some discernment, when they see trends like the one to cut off all their hair. And if you put these messages, especially the one in the collegiate photo, into its proper context, you can see that whitey’s fascist agenda is meant to do one thing—hurt you, instead of help you.

Later…

—MontUHURU Mimia

P.S.

Now, this is the trailer for the Netflix movie, “Nappily Ever After”. And more than anything, I want you to notice the traumatized look on Sanaa’s face while she’s cutting off all her hair. And, when she sees herself in the mirror the next day, she screams, while a song lyric plays in the background saying, “I almost lost my mind…” Also, notice in one of the following scenes after “The Big Chop”, Sanaa is drinking beer with her woman friends in a bar—this is yet another attempt to make Black women look hyper-masculine, and to keep them in that stereotype.

P.P.S.

For all the Black women thinking that I’m just talking disparagingly about sistas with short hair, I want you to take a look at this vid of Grace Jones performing the song, “La Vie en Rose”. Now, even though Grace is supposed to be the poster woman for the hyper-masculine sista, here, her exquisite femininity is on full display. Meaning, regardless of her physical features not conforming to the white fascist status quo, the feminine wiles she uses to perform this song, make her nothing short of mesmerizing to watch—so hopefully, everyone can see that beautifully feminine energy is SPIRITUAL, NOT (NECESSARILY) PHYSICAL!

P.P.P.S.

Lastly, here’s Sinead O’Connor performing her song “Troy” live—and in it, you can see the rageful angst and previous traumas she was subjected to, in her performance, lyrics, and singing style. And once again, the trauma(s) she suffered, are the reasons she choose her “buzz-cutted” hairdo.

And family, if you'd like to see the first 2 posts that inspired this new “series”, you can do that HERE and HERE.