“Move your money” was a campaign organized by Arianna Huffington
(co-creator of “The Huffington Post”) in 2009 as a response to 2008’s “financial
crisis”. And behind this and similar initiatives in the last decade, more than
four million accounts have been closed out of “too big to fail” banks in america.
As a testament to this, one day during the “Occupy Wall Street”
movement, several protesters were arrested for trespassing in front of a New
York “Citibank”. When cops questioned them, they told the officers they were
only there to close their accounts.
Now in an ancillary movement, documented in an article titled: “People are leaving the workforce in droves, and what it means for businesses”,
stats from the 2013 u.s. Department of Labor report that americans are leaving jobs at such
a high rate, that in roughly four years the number of americans working
traditional jobs will be eclipsed by the number of them opting out of the
american workforce altogether.
In another related article titled: “I'm Outta Here!, Why 2
Million Americans Quit Every Month”, what’s stated emphatically is the biggest
reason for “quits” is employees no longer trust corporations.
And what will these workforce drop-outs do for a dollar? According
to these articles and others, they’ll become entrepreneurs and work for
themselves.
With the advent of the internet and better on-line technologies,
more and more americans are trading in their corporate cubicles for a home
office.
And that spells trouble for the elite.
Why? Cause as more and more people depend less on a check from
corporations and government jobs, more of the proletariat can acquire and
circulate monies amongst themselves, thus cutting out elitist middle-men. In
laymen’s terms, if this viral entrepreneurism goes national and global, we
could see a day in the near future where the elites could be put out of
business.
And for every person thinking about taxes associated with
opening a business, I’d like to note that if the working classes are the ones
generating and circulating the lion’s share of america’s capital outside the
realms of corporate and government jobs, we’d have the majority say of how and
where these monies are spent. Or we could just realize that we never needed
money in the first place. Cause before the elitist monetary system was created,
the proletariat ‘bartered’ for goods and services.
Truth be told, money was only
created to restrict our access to resources. Currency notes and coins are
nothing but monetary gate keepers meant to provide access controls and barriers
between us and the 1% of persons controlling all the world’s material goods.
And here’s the underscored bottom line, the elite know that the
proletariat can shut their global sham down simply by not showing up to work
for a day or two.
So I’ve said all that to say this: Too many of us are unplugging
from the ‘Real life’ Matrix, and it's making the ruling elite nervous.
Now, the phrase ‘Ordo Ab Chao’ is latin and translates into
‘Order out of chaos’. And this is one method fascist freemasons use to keep the
proletariat under their collective thumbs.
And there’s several ways I could explain how this concept works,
but for the sake of not making this post any lengthier than it needs to be,
I’ll say this ideology deals with elites knowing that if you want to better
control any organization…or organism, one of the best ways to do it is by
destabilizing the target and throwing it into a state of dysfunction. Then, you
offer the target your solution to the problem. And once this solution is
administered, it’s diagnosis will make the target operate in accordance with the
desires of the fascist elite.
For example, in the early 1970’s a rich business tycoon said he
was at a dinner party and happened to strike up a conversation with a member of
the Rockefeller family. While conversing the Rockefeller asked the businessman:
“Tell me, what do you think of the Woman’s Lib movement?”
The tycoon responded: “Well, overall I think it’s positive,
women getting equal pay for equal work and all.”
The Rockefeller replied: “Listen, we funded Women’s Lib, and the
main reason was because we couldn’t tax half the population if women were
staying at home and being housewives. Not only did we want to get women into
the workforce, but we knew that with both parents out of the home, what essentially
would be raising their kids would be the TV, so the generations after theirs would
be much easier to program.”
Now, I’d like to focus on the Rockefeller’s last statement about
kids being raised by TV. This sentiment is telling when it comes to the elite’s
main target for destabilization over the course of the last half-century.
And that target is the nuclear family.
See, if you destabilize the nuclear family and have a spate of
one-parent households dominating any country, the children of those households
will be infinitely more corruptible than a child coming from a stable two-parent
home. Now let me expound on this further…
What I’m not saying is
that children from single-parent households are destined to be morally obtuse
and criminal-minded, what I am saying is these children will more than likely
have some sort of emotional instability from not growing up with both parents.
And more than likely, this will affect their decision making to the point where
they’ll be more willing to do certain things that the child who has the counsel
of both parents won’t. And monetarily, the child may not have access to items
they want or need because there’s only one household income. And this more than
anything may affect their decision making.
So for the last several decades, the elite have thrown every
effort into destroying the nuclear family and keeping it dysfunctional. And one
of the best ways to do this is by eradicating traditional gender roles.
Enter the Wachowski brothers…siblings….I mean, sisters.
Now, last year I wrote about Larry Wachowski becoming Lana, and
a week ago, I found out that his brother Andy has now taken the transgender
plunge and become ‘Lilly’. After shaking my head for several minutes, I have to admit
to being mildly shocked, but I wasn’t surprised.
Here’s why…
Like I said earlier, with more and more americans/global
citizens being distrustful of corporations and with the elite seeing our exodus from the traditional workforce, the powers that be need to be reassured that we're kept in the “construct”
that the “real-life” Matrix is built on. Thus, they have to up the ante with their techniques of keeping us ‘corruptible’.
So the Wachowski’s are not only helping to mainstream
homosexuality, but they and others like “Caitlyn” Jenner are ushering in an era
of total gender confusion. Our
children are being told that they don’t have to be boys or girls. Thus, the elites are asking them to be some kind of human
hybrid.
And soon the elites will have an official title for the
‘genderless’ human. This will be followed by initiatives to bait them back into
the Real-Life Matrix with the promise of more access to resources via
government programs that cater specifically to them.
And that’s what the Wachowski sisters and Caitlyn Jenner are really
spearheading.
So let me break this all
the way down and say:
The matrix has you…
But the good news is, it can’t keep you…not unless you want to
be kept.
And the solution to this is simple. The proletariat…us, we need to endorse and sponsor a
return to traditional gendered, two-parent households that have the greatest
chance at producing less corruptible children…or children period. Remember,
more than likely, a genderless hybrid won’t be interested in producing
offspring. They’ll probably wind up with a same-sexed person that’s just as
confused as they are.
So it’s time for everyone in this age of gender confusion to choose
between the red and the blue pill.
Cause I know which capsule I’m clutching.
It’s the one leading me out of all this sexually ambiguous non-sense
and has me realizing that the behaviors associated with this kind of
confliction are more conducive to a ‘death-style’, not a life-style.
So which pill will you pick?
And remember, if you don’t care about the elites plans for you, you
should at least be concerned about their plans for our children.
So for their sakes, choose wisely.
Later…
MontUHURU Mimia